Search for: "Naruto v. Slater" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2018, 12:22 pm by Michel Bélanger-Roy
Rappel des événements : en 2011, le photographe David Slater est en Indonésie afin de réaliser un reportage sur les macaques. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Now, in Naruto, a Crested Macaque, by and through his Next Friends, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and Antje Engelhardt, Ph.D. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
  There could be a third argument- i.e. that they both had the same idea, contributed significant relevant originality (Brighton v Jones [2004]) and, in fact, the selfies are works of joint authorship; there being collaboration present and no need for an intention to create a joint work (Beckingham v Hodgens [2002]). [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:32 am by Andres
While the terms of the settlement are not known, both parties have revealed that Slater agreed to donate a percentage of his royalties to the monkey refuge where Naruto the monkey lives. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:48 am by Kevin
 See Naruto, a Crested Macaque, by and through his Next Friends, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:47 am by Ben
And in Access Copyright v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 2:07 pm by Brett Trout
” In reaching this conclusion, the Copyright Office relies on the case of Naruto v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
This has included divine beings (Urantia Found. v Kristen Maaherra), gardens (Kelley v Chicago Park District) and monkeys (Naruto v Slater). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
This has included divine beings (Urantia Found. v Kristen Maaherra), gardens (Kelley v Chicago Park District) and monkeys (Naruto v Slater). [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:12 am by Allan Blutstein
RM comment: The Ninth Circuit also dealt with the question of animals and statutory interpretation earlier this year in Naruto v. [read post]