Search for: "Nate Anderson"
Results 81 - 100
of 134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 10:18 am
Nate Anderson of Ars Technica has posted an interview with Sen. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm
The Need for Authorization Nate Anderson of Ars Technica, who did a great service in running side-by-side the provisions in the FCC’s final Order and the terms of Verizon-Google’s proposed legislative framework, asks the key question, “Why is Verizon suing over net neutrality rules it once supported? [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:39 am
http://tinyurl.com/4frrun2 (Nick Brestoff) Companies Face ‘Legal Potholes’ as they Crack Down on Workers’ Social Media Posts - http://ht.ly/3JiAQ (Debra Cassena Weiss) Compliance is Not Just a HIPAA – HITECH Issue – http://bit.ly/dSyV3c (Jack Anderson) Confidentiality Obligations in Outsourcing Agreements – http://bit.ly/ftiifx (Richard Austin) Disregarding Obligation to Preserve “Costs” Defendants – http://tinyurl.com/4m5nc95 (Al… [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 10:21 am
Uncle Sam has $30M to bypass Chinese, Iranian ‘Net filters By Nate Anderson Need to get around a Chinese government firewall? [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
by Paul Alan Levy We have previously blogged about the crucial role played by section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in protecting the ability of consumers to speak effectively about corporate or political wrongdoing, by protecting the hosts of web sites and email services from being sued over the contents of communications that are made using their services. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 11:16 am
Nate Anderson reported at Ars Technica.com that the consequences of an award like these could be life-altering to the average Joe defendant in these types of cases. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:02 pm
No, it’s really, really, REALLY not.In fact, Comcast has actually been rather nice to Level3, according to Nate Anderson at Arstechnica: Comcast “was able to scramble and provide Level 3 with six ports (at no charge) that were, by chance, available and not budgeted and forecasted for Comcast’s wholesale commercial customers. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
Nate Anderson, EU Denies ACTA Document Request; Democracy Undermined? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:30 pm
" Nate Anderson, Ars Technica, Apple loses big in DRM ruling: jailbreaks are "fair use" "This time, the Library went (comparatively) nuts, allowing widespread bypassing of the CSS encryption on DVDs, declaring iPhone jailbreaking to be 'fair use,' and letting consumers crack their legally purchased e-books in order to have them read aloud by computers. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:50 pm
First off, here are your new Internet freedoms:Jailbreaking Your Phone Nate Anderson at Ars Technica cheers: "The most surprising ruling was on 'jailbreaking' one's phone (exemption number two), replacing the company-provided operating system with a hacked version that has fewer limitations. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
But, apparently not: According to Nate Anderson, the reasons for preserving these bits of ephemera reflect modern trends in scholarship: There’s been a turn toward historicism in academic circles over the last few decades, a turn that emphasizes not just official histories and novels but the diaries of women who never wrote for publication, or the oral histories of soldiers from the Civil War, or the letters written by a sawmill owner. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:33 am
Copyright By Nate Anderson Ars Technica Bashing current copyright law is easy—just ask Jessica Litman, a professor of law at the University of Michigan. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:07 am
I agree with people like Ben Sheffner and Nate Anderson who comment that what we have seen of ACTA does not affect the United States that much, they already have the mother of all maximalist copyright protection. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 7:15 pm
But if they're going to argue that ACTA would change existing US law, they're not going to find evidence of that in this leaked draft -- or, as far as I can tell, anywhere else.Update: Read Nate Anderson's piece in Ars Technica, which similarly concludes that the draft "simply reflects existing US law. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 8:00 pm
Harvard Robert Anderson (Washington). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 6:44 pm
UPDATE: Comments from Nate Anderson at Ars Technica (including a more thorough recitation of the case's factual background) and Ben Sheffner (including links to many of the source materials in the case). [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:17 am
[Nate Anderson, Ars Technica] Tags: RIAA and file sharing Related posts YouTube users at legal risk? [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:06 pm
And make sure to read Nate Anderson's take on the MPAA letter in Ars Technica. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:19 pm
"Much of the recent attention has been the result of a leaked September 30 EU memo that is, as aptly described by Ars Technica's Nate Anderson, "a written account of an oral report on a draft document that was itself still being altered. [read post]
