Search for: "Nathan Smith" Results 221 - 240 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In addition, as law professors Robert Tuttle and Peter Smith explained last week in an essay for the Huffington Post, the McCreary case could also bear on the validity of a new EO. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Starnes
Nielsen, Houston Dustin Eugene Nimz, Wichita Falls Richard Keith Oliver, Houston Jed Ross Silverman, Houston Catherine Page Simpson, Fort Worth David Aaron Smith, Angleton Joe David Wells, Missouri City Lloyd Edward Whelchel, Fort Worth Rose M. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:33 pm
  I know that Brad [Smith] spoke with you yesterday about the offer. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:59 am by Dennis Crouch
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
21 May 2021, 1:35 am by Tessa Shepperson
In a recent training webinar, solicitor David Smith told us that there was no prospect of section 21 reform before 2023, and indeed no guarantee that it will go ahead at all. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
21 May 2021, 1:35 am by Tessa Shepperson
In a recent training webinar, solicitor David Smith told us that there was no prospect of section 21 reform before 2023, and indeed no guarantee that it will go ahead at all. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Nathan Soweya: breaking out to do something new. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 8:25 am by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am by Dennis Crouch
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:03 am by admin
  “The governor has decided to use the discretionary money for economic development,” said a spokesman for Nathan Deal, Georgia’s governor, a Republican. [read post]