Search for: "Nathan Smith" Results 241 - 260 of 375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Starnes
Nielsen, Houston Dustin Eugene Nimz, Wichita Falls Richard Keith Oliver, Houston Jed Ross Silverman, Houston Catherine Page Simpson, Fort Worth David Aaron Smith, Angleton Joe David Wells, Missouri City Lloyd Edward Whelchel, Fort Worth Rose M. [read post]
11 May 2023, 3:04 am by Seán Binder
 Nathan Layne and Tim Reid report for Reuters. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Starnes
Nielsen, Houston Dustin Eugene Nimz, Wichita Falls Richard Keith Oliver, Houston Jed Ross Silverman, Houston Catherine Page Simpson, Fort Worth David Aaron Smith, Angleton Joe David Wells, Missouri City Lloyd Edward Whelchel, Fort Worth Rose M. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
ACLU attorney Nathan Wessler presented argument, presumably drawing from the joint civil liberties group amicus brief. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm by Dennis Crouch
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:58 am
Nowell, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, May 2, 2020 Tags: Board performance, Boards of Directors, ESG, Institutional Investors, Overboarding, Proxy advisors, Shareholder voting Anticipated Securities Litigation in Response to the Pandemic Posted by Jason Halper, Nathan Bull, and Matthew Karlan, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, on Sunday, May 3, 2020 … [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Nathan Soweya: breaking out to do something new. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am by Dennis Crouch
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
21 May 2021, 1:35 am by Tessa Shepperson
In a recent training webinar, solicitor David Smith told us that there was no prospect of section 21 reform before 2023, and indeed no guarantee that it will go ahead at all. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:43 am
Ct. 455 (1935) for the proposition "*1075 Under the statute it is the claims of the patent which define the invention" and cited Smith v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:23 am by Alfred Brophy
 Second, I'm interested in how ideas in the Shenandoah Valley compared with those at tidewater schools (like Randolph Macon, where William Smith gave his lectures on slavery and William and Mary, where Thomas Dew and Nathan Beverly Tucker taught and where Abel Upshur gave an important proslavery talk) and also the ideas at the anchor in the piedmont: the University of Virginia. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:33 pm
  I know that Brad [Smith] spoke with you yesterday about the offer. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]