Search for: "National Bank v. Commonwealth" Results 61 - 80 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by Rosalind English
The respondents’ names been placed on a United Nations list of persons believed to be associated with terrorism. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:55 pm by Adam Wagner
In two further decisions given on the same day, the same judges held that the Treasury must give sufficient disclosure to allow a bank accused of involvement in Iranian nuclear proliferation to not just deny but refute the allegations (Bank Mellat v HM Treasury), and that the Home Office must provide the “gist” of material it had wanted to keep secret from an employment tribunal (Home Office v Tariq). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:46 pm by Daniel Isenberg
  De Werd argues that on such issues a ‘bottom-up’ approach is appropriate – with national courts taking the lead. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Legal Beagle
Willmott of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.# On 15 January 2008 the Acting President of the Fourth Section to which the case had been allocated decided to give notice of the application to the Government. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
The Center for Internet and Society blog has posted a series of comments on the California  Consumer Privacy Act [pdf] The IpKat blog has a piece by Jessica Banks “Smart watches: a helping hand or sinister culture of surveillance? [read post]
10 Dec 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
 Since a copyright is property, [the plaintiff] may very well be able to sue in state court on a state-law claim for essentially the harm that she contends the Commonwealth has perpetrated. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Prasad Trading Co. etc. [1991 (4) SCC 270] and New Moga Transport Co., through itsProprietor v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Brendan French, a Commonwealth Bank boss, has been awarded $300,000 in a defamation payout after experiencing a ‘hellish’ stalking campaign. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
"Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi ( -->Views expressed in this note are personal )I Background Within 72 hours of assuming power and even before any of its elected representatives were sworn in formally as Members of Parliament, the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) Government advised the President of India to promulgate two Ordinances. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:56 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/3z9svqa (Philip Gordon) No Duty to Disclose That Office Equipment Retained Data — Putnam Bank v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:58 am by INFORRM
I mean all banking information – banks already have obligations of confidence, they have contractual remedies, they are subject to the Privacy Act and now the Privacy Commissioner has the power to give penalties. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:43 am by Jim Duffy
The Snowden Leaks Case: Liberty & Ors v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Ors [2015] UKIPTrib 13 77-H This was a historic decision if only for the fact that it was the first time the Investigatory Powers Tribunal had ever found against the Government. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
Samsung: Lack of Custodian Follow-Up+Failure to Suspend Auto-Deletion of Email=Adverse Inference - http://bit.ly/MaaYhA (@LegalHoldPro) Who's Tweeting live from the Apple v Samsung trial? [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
The U.N. wants rich nations to put up $10 billion annually between 2010 and 2012 for climate change mitigation. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Click Here District Court approves consent decree between feds, Mobil Oil. – Pacific Daily News, July 27, 2010 District Court of Guam Chief Judge Frances Tydingco-Gatewood approved a months-old consent decree between the federal government and Mobil Oil that requires the company to pay $2.4 million in penalties for allegedly violating the Clean Air Act on Guam and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. [read post]