Search for: "National Council v. State Council" Results 81 - 100 of 4,691
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Riccardo Calzavara, Arden Chambers
The Court of Appeal was bound by the decisions in Zalewska v Department for Social Development [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] 1 WLR 2602 and Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1310; [2009] PTSR 897. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:53 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Adam Liptak wrote about my favorite exchange of the day: The question for the justices was whether that state law conflicted with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allows voters to register using a federal form that asks, “Are you a citizen of the United States? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:56 am by sally
R (Tilianu) v Social Fund Inspector and another [2010] EWHC 213 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 54 “Although art 7(3)(b)-(d) of Council Directive 2004/38/EC of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states (OJ 2004 L158, p 77), applied to formerly employed workers, it did not apply to those who had been self employed. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:36 am by tracey
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Czop and another: (Joined Cases C-147/11 and C-148/11);   [2012] WLR (D)  264 “Article 12 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community conferred on the person who was the primary carer of a migrant worker’s or former migrant worker’s child who was attending educational courses in the host member state a right of residence in that… [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:00 am
The Gallup (NM) Independent reported yesterday that the Navajo Nation Council has approved its attorneys meeting with the Obama administration to try to work out a settlement in Navajo Nation v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:53 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Handgun Control Federation of Ohio and Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am by Larry Catá Backer
The Human Rights Council furthermore decided to establish a Forum on Business and Human Rights under the guidance of the Working Group.[5] NOTES:[1] Human Rights Council resolution 17/4, annex [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:07 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Ralph Zacklin (formerly, Assistant Secretary-General for Legal Affairs, United Nations) has published The United Nations Secretariat and the Use of Force in a Unipolar World: Power v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:43 am by Paul Cruikshank
The judge at first instance ruled in favour of the Council, stating that (i) the maps didn’t meet that statutory requirements; and (ii) the extent of the non-compliance was de minimus (i.e small enough to be overlooked). [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:04 pm
Douhan, United Nations and Regional Organizations: Complementarity v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 1:06 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Image by Perzon SEO On September 19, 2017, the American Immigration Council in cooperation with Mayer Brown LLP, filed a lawsuit in federal district court on behalf of the National Venture Capital Association (National Venture Capital Association, et.al. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 9:46 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department (CJEU), with introductory note by Anne Aagten United Nations Security Council Resolution 2379, with introductory note by Scott A. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
The Forum was established by the Human Rights Council, and is guided by the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm by NL
SL, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Council [2010] EWHC 3182 (Admin) A rolled up permission and substantive judicial review hearing on the issue of whether the local authority owed a duty under s.21 National Assistance Act 1948 (as amended), with the complication that NASS had accepted a duty to accommodate in the meantime. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm by NL
SL, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Council [2010] EWHC 3182 (Admin) A rolled up permission and substantive judicial review hearing on the issue of whether the local authority owed a duty under s.21 National Assistance Act 1948 (as amended), with the complication that NASS had accepted a duty to accommodate in the meantime. [read post]