Search for: "National Home v. Wood" Results 1 - 20 of 270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2009, 2:08 pm
Wood also had joined the panel in Hein v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
William Wood has published “The (Potential) Legal History of Indian Gaming” in the Arizona Law Review. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The first relates to the scope of the disapplication: the Secretary of State for the Home Department who was defending DRIPA in this case raised at the last minute whether national security fell within the scope of EU law. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of) Reetha Suppiah and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Interveners [2011] EWHC 2 (Admin) – Read judgment A high court judge has ruled that two asylum seekers and their children were unlawfully detained at Yarl’s Wood immigration centre last year. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Wood, earlier here, here, and here] Also on the topic of jury nullification, is that an appropriate metaphor for things happening with the Senate and impeachment? [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:38 am
The fires caused the evacuation of more than 45,000 Kelowna residents, destroyed more than 300 homes and many businesses, and resulted in three deaths.One group of surveyed homeowners from Kelowna did not lose their homes but were at risk of future wildfires because they lived in or near highly wooded areas similar to places where fires recently occurred. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Robert Kreisman
  Related blog posts: Nursing Home Visits Key to the Mental Health of Residents Illinois Supreme Court Decides Arbitration Rights in Nursing Home Death Case; Carter v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:40 am by Adam Levitin
 JPMorgan Chase Bank, armed with six partners at two AmLaw 100 firms (Wilmer Hale and McGuire Woods) took the truly unusual step of filing an objection to an amicus curiae brief I filed in a 9th Circuit case called McShannock v. [read post]