Search for: "National Labor Relations Board" Results 81 - 100 of 8,669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2011, 5:50 am by Seth Borden
In about an hour, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce will gavel in its hearing, "Emerging Trends at the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Generally, the bill would amend the National Labor Relations Act to modify the authority of the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 12:22 pm
Ever wonder what the National Labor Relations Board does? [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm
Today marked the 75th anniversary of the National Labor Relations Board's enforcement of the National Labor Relations Act, the primary law governing relations between employers and employees in the private sector, which was signed by President Franklin Roosevelt on July 5, 1935. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
Back in September, I joked that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) was on the verge of disbanding. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by Lee Tankle
” If the National Labor Relations Board seemed to be on the ropes in 2013, it certainly came out swinging in 2014. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:48 am by Seth Borden
In his introductory note to Board staff, the Acting GC described 2011 as "another successful fiscal year enforcing the National Labor Relations Act," and "another year of excellent casehandling performance. [read post]
Department of Labor (DOL) and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) announced that the two agencies signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) detailing procedures on information-sharing, joint investigations and enforcement activity, and training meant to strengthen the agencies’ partnership in enforcing the laws administered between the two agencies. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 12:41 pm by Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP
The National Labor Relation’s Board decision regarding joint-employer status for workers formerly not classified as employees in the case of Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. includes numerous implications for employment law. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 12:41 pm by Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP
The National Labor Relation’s Board decision regarding joint-employer status for workers formerly not classified as employees in the case of Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. includes numerous implications for employment law. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:08 pm by Seth Borden
Last week, the Office of the General Counsel issued an Operations Memorandum advising Regional Offices of the National Labor Relations Board that they should conduct training of field personnel on how to administer the new election processing rules. [read post]
8 May 2019, 11:40 am by John Bolesta and Ryan Munitz
On April 29, 2019, the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) issued Memorandum GC 19-06, which provides guidance to the Board’s regional offices on how to handle cases involving Beck objectors and how to allocate secondary expenses related to union lobbying activity after the Board’s March 1, 2019 decision in United Nurses & Allied Professionals (Kent… [read post]
On June 6, 2018, the National Labor Relation Board’s (“NLRB” or “Board”) General Counsel issued Memorandum GC 18-04 (“GC 18-04”), which provides guidance to employers on the legality of certain handbook rules following the Board’s decision in The Boeing Company, 365 NLRB No. 154 (Dec. 14, 2017). [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:35 am by Holland & Hart
Gutierrez         In recent years, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has issued some notable decisions that impact both union and non-union employers nationwide. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:10 am by laborprof lpb
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has proposed a rule requiring posting of NLRA rights. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:48 am by Shannon R. Creasy
., 359 NLRB No. 13, the National Labor Relations Board held 2-1 that employers have a duty to respond in a timely manner to Union requests for information, even when the information sought is irrelevant to the Union’s representation of the employees. [read post]