Search for: "National Labor Relations Board" Results 101 - 120 of 8,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2012, 7:48 am by Shannon R. Creasy
., 359 NLRB No. 13, the National Labor Relations Board held 2-1 that employers have a duty to respond in a timely manner to Union requests for information, even when the information sought is irrelevant to the Union’s representation of the employees. [read post]
On May 9, 2018, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) announced it is considering rulemaking to address the standard for determining joint-employer status under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 11:50 am by Brennan W. Bolt
Res 36, a Resolution of Disapproval aimed at prohibiting the National Labor Relations Board from implementing its new election rules that will shorten the time between the filing of an NLRB petition and the conduct of a union representation election. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 11:00 pm
As many employers are aware, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) has held that an employer has the right to maintain common-sense workplace rules regarding use of company email systems. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:10 pm by Epstein Becker Green
McGahan On Thursday, August 18, 2011, the Acting General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) issued a report on the outcome of 14 cases involving employees’ use of social media or social media policies in general. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:00 pm by Michelle Capezza
Martin Stanberry In another foray by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) into new territory affecting non-union workplaces, a divided three-member Board panel found that an employer’s direction that employees not discuss matters under investigation with their co-workers violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) because it… [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 11:27 am
The New York Times reports that the National Labor Relations Board has "ruled that employers have the right to prohibit workers from using the company's e-mail system to send out union-related messages, a decision that could hamper communications between labor unions and their membership. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:56 am by Lee Tankle
" If the National Labor Relations Board seemed to be on the ropes in 2013, it certainly came out swinging in 2014. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:24 pm by Seth Borden
Martone yesterday issued an Order granting summary judgment to the State of Arizona in the National Labor Relations Board's lawsuit challenging an amendment to the state's constitution. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:00 pm by Emily Coombs Waddell
Employers should review all agreements which contain non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions as they relate to standards defined in the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:42 am by James J. La Rocca
The statute is enforced and interpreted by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which is headquartered in Washington, DC and has regional offices throughout the country. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 7:14 am
  Many people are familiar with the Board Decisions. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:38 pm by Seth Borden
  Fueling many of the changes last year were the impending departures of National Labor Relations Board Chairman Wilma Liebman and Member Craig Becker. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 4:45 am by Eric B. Meyer
Earlier this month, a National Labor Relations Board Administrative Law Judge ruled that a non-union employer violated the National Labor Relations Act by utilizing unlawful noncompete and nonsolicitation provisions in employment agreements. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:52 pm by Adam Santucci
On December 21, 2010, the National Labor Relations Board ("Board") issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (pdf), which, if finalized, would require employers to notify employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act ("Act"). [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm by Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP
By a vote of 3-2, the National Labor Relations Board revised how it will decide joint-employer status, a move that will affect nearly three million temporary workers across the nation. [read post]