Search for: "National Labor Relations Board v. Arizona, State of"
Results 1 - 20
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2012, 4:24 pm
Martone yesterday issued an Order granting summary judgment to the State of Arizona in the National Labor Relations Board's lawsuit challenging an amendment to the state's constitution. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:30 am
In the lawsuit, the Board claims that Arizona Constitution Article 2 § 37 is pre-empted by the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:35 am
This past Friday, January 14, 2011, the National Labor Relations Board advised the Attorneys General of four states – Arizona, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah – that the National Labor Relations Act preempts constitutional amendments to require the use of secret ballots in union representation elections. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:55 pm
Businesses concerned about Obama Administration-backed efforts to promote its pro-labor agenda must stay diligent despite the set back suffered by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in its attempt to a Federal Judge to challenge state laws that purport to require secret balloting in union elections in NLRB v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:07 am
See State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:05 am
Also, stay tuned for a digital presentation of items that we will feature on Law.gov related to the 50th anniversary of Miranda v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 5:27 pm
The National Labor Relations Board has indicated its intent to sue four states – Arizona, Utah, South Dakota, and South Carolina – because each has adopted a constitutional provision that guarantees a secret ballot for establishment of a collective bargaining unit. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:00 am
Normally, we don’t post these kinds of updates from law firms, but this is so well done and has links to primary documents we crave (see bolded text under the fold), so here goes: Three recent unfair labor practice cases leveled against Indian nation casinos by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) have gone in three different directions. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
National Labor Relations Board (08-1457), and Levin, Tax Commissioner of Ohio v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The Board contends that state constitutional amendments like Arizona's are preempted by the NLRB. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:36 am
AndreOn January 14, 2010, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") issued a press release stating it informed the Attorneys General of Arizona, of South Carolina, and of Utah that recently-approved constitutional amendments to those states' laws requiring that union elections be conducted only by secret-ballot elections and not by submission of signed union authorization cards or by other means. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:38 pm
Morris relied on determinations by the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) in the D.R. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am
Dobbs Made Things Worse National Indian Health Board announces A.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:20 am
The new case — like one in 2014 — involves the staffing of the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
Today the court hears oral argument in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
., 360 NLRB No.117 (May 28, 2014), the National Labor Relations Board again demonstrated its pro-employee bias and its willingness to twist a circuit court mandate and facts to achieve a partisan result. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
The California Agricultural Labor Relations Act of 1975, as amended by the Davis Administration in 2003 to provide for interest arbitration in first contract negotiations, was viewed as a dream statute from the perspective of collective bargaining proponents, seen particularly through the lens of the inadequacy of the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Kreisberg 14-93Issue: (1) Whether a companion authorization issued by the general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board in conjunction with an order from the board itself, purporting to possess a quorum and take the same action on its own behalf, suffices to authorize a Section 10(j) proceeding commenced while the board itself lacked a quorum to authorize it; and (2) whether the familiar four-factor test for preliminary injunctive relief… [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:37 am
In C&C, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) alleged that the employer unlawfully fired 20 workers for engaging in union activity. [read post]
