Search for: "National Market Reports, Inc. v. Brown" Results 81 - 100 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Soon all corporations began to recognize and appreciate the need for mechanisms to enable fraud detection and greater financial accountability, while investors increasingly relied upon financial reports as corporations began to participate in the stock market.[2]   But when the stock market crashed in 1929, it became apparent that voluntary financial auditing programs alone were insufficient to protect investors from inaccurate and misleading information that… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:13 am
Supreme Court rulings, including this month's Quanta Computer Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
His reasoning laid the foundation for the historic 1954 Brown v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 2:36 pm by Aaron Moss
Of the Supreme Court members who will decide Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm by WIMS
      In April 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:38 am by Yolanda Young
Board of Regents of Univ. of Oklahoma—forced law school integration and formed the precedent used to dismantle school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   AT&T, Inc v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  Aside from the difficulties that Google and other internet intermediaries are having in determining what is inaccurate, out of date and irrelevant, the reported English cases since Costeja, most notably Daniel Hegglin v Google Inc ([2014] EWHC 2808 (QB)) and Max Mosley v Google Inc and Google Limited ([2015 ] EWHC 59 (QB)) have highlighted a very significant tension between data protection law and the law of defamation and other content laws… [read post]