Search for: "National Union v. Arnold" Results 1 - 20 of 132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2016, 12:47 am
" (para 67)Yesterday Arnold J gave judgment in this saga (Nestlé v Cadbury [2016] EWHC 50 (Ch)), and dismissed Nestlé's appeal.WTF?!? [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
 SPC applications are made to national IPOs who are not medicines authorities subject to the Medicinal Products Directive. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
On 22 May 2009 Mr Justice Arnold told us that he was referring a number of questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary reference in one of the most exciting and potentially important trade mark law disputes to be heard in England and Wales in recent times -- the titan struggle between luxury cosmetic kings L’Oréal SA and online auction host eBay (see IPKat post here for background). [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
Sir Richard Arnold would like to see a mandatory list of copyright limitations. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Way back in November, before the Court of Justice of the European Union had given its ruling in the Google AdWords case, Mr Justice Arnold contrived to ask a mammoth list of no fewer than ten questions of that Court, in the Chancery Division (England and Wales) dispute between trade mark owner Interflora and ever-so-cheeky AdWord purchaser and retail giant Marks & Spencer. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:57 am by Eleonora Rosati
 At the national level, also super-learned Mr Justice Arnold said [in his 2013 decision in SAS v WPL, at para 27] that:"In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act." [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
KATNOTE: IF YOU ARE QUITE FAMILIAR WITH THE FACTS THAT TRIGGERED THIS PIECE OF LITIGATION, THE QUESTIONS REFERRED FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING BY THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S OPINION, YOU CAN SKIP THIS POST AND MOVE STRAIGHT ON TO L’Oréal  v eBay II: what the Court says   It was only two short years ago that Mr Justice Arnold told us that he was referring a number of questions to the Court of Justice of the European… [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
4) ISPs should bear implementation costs ... and may think of preventative filtering as a cheaper solutionSimilarly to what stated in his earlier judgment in 20C Fox v BT (No 2), Arnold J took the view that "the rightholders should pay the costs of an unopposed application ... [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
Following earlier judgment in FAPL v Sky, the judge found that both the websites infringed the Claimants' right of communication the public. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
What this provision requires was clarified [as recalled at para 59] by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its 2011 decision in L'Oréal:1. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 10:30 am by Florian Mueller
Justice Richard Arnold of the England & Wales High Court (previously mentioned on this blog for his invalidation of a Motorola junk patent and a Nokia v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive explanation of trademarks | Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
Arnold J allowed the appeal in part. [read post]