Search for: "National Union v. Arnold"
Results 1 - 20
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2008, 5:47 pm
Arnold S. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:47 am
" (para 67)Yesterday Arnold J gave judgment in this saga (Nestlé v Cadbury [2016] EWHC 50 (Ch)), and dismissed Nestlé's appeal.WTF?!? [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:54 pm
The reasoning of the CJEU in GAT v LuK was equally applicable here. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
SPC applications are made to national IPOs who are not medicines authorities subject to the Medicinal Products Directive. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
Sir Richard Arnold would like to see a mandatory list of copyright limitations. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
On 22 May 2009 Mr Justice Arnold told us that he was referring a number of questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary reference in one of the most exciting and potentially important trade mark law disputes to be heard in England and Wales in recent times -- the titan struggle between luxury cosmetic kings L’Oréal SA and online auction host eBay (see IPKat post here for background). [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Way back in November, before the Court of Justice of the European Union had given its ruling in the Google AdWords case, Mr Justice Arnold contrived to ask a mammoth list of no fewer than ten questions of that Court, in the Chancery Division (England and Wales) dispute between trade mark owner Interflora and ever-so-cheeky AdWord purchaser and retail giant Marks & Spencer. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:31 am
It just a few months ago that this blog reported on the Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev in the Sky v SkyKick, C-371/18 case.important A referral from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales made by Arnold J (as he then was), the Sky case is probably the most important referral in the EU trade mark field made over the past few years. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 7:27 am
The second complaint was filed by the National Treasury Employees Union and three of its members. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:26 am
Union v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
At the national level, also super-learned Mr Justice Arnold said [in his 2013 decision in SAS v WPL, at para 27] that:"In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act." [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
Arnold J did not seem too convinced]. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
4) ISPs should bear implementation costs ... and may think of preventative filtering as a cheaper solutionSimilarly to what stated in his earlier judgment in 20C Fox v BT (No 2), Arnold J took the view that "the rightholders should pay the costs of an unopposed application ... [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
Following earlier judgment in FAPL v Sky, the judge found that both the websites infringed the Claimants' right of communication the public. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:49 am
The trial is drawing national attention because it presents a U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
KATNOTE: IF YOU ARE QUITE FAMILIAR WITH THE FACTS THAT TRIGGERED THIS PIECE OF LITIGATION, THE QUESTIONS REFERRED FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING BY THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S OPINION, YOU CAN SKIP THIS POST AND MOVE STRAIGHT ON TO L’Oréal v eBay II: what the Court says It was only two short years ago that Mr Justice Arnold told us that he was referring a number of questions to the Court of… [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
What this provision requires was clarified [as recalled at para 59] by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its 2011 decision in L'Oréal:1. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Garland v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 10:30 am
Justice Richard Arnold of the England & Wales High Court (previously mentioned on this blog for his invalidation of a Motorola junk patent and a Nokia v. [read post]
