Search for: "National Union v. Arnold"
Results 21 - 40
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
That application led to a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-323/09, noted by the IPKat here, then came back for trial before Arnold J in June of this year at [2012] EWHC 1722 (Ch). when the judge gave permission to Interflora to run one of two pilot surveys which it wished to conduct. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:45 am
Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive explanation of trademarks | Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
Arnold J allowed the appeal in part. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:35 am
Personally, I have been very interested in it for a while [see here], and so has been apparently the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
Referral and AG’s Opinion Arnold J in the English Court referred five questions to the CJEU, which the AG opined as follows: Question 1: Can an EU or national trade mark be declared invalid, in whole or in part, on the grounds that the specification of goods and services lack sufficient clarity and precision? [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
Referral and AG’s Opinion Arnold J in the English Court referred five questions to the CJEU, which the AG opined as follows: Question 1: Can an EU or national trade mark be declared invalid, in whole or in part, on the grounds that the specification of goods and services lack sufficient clarity and precision? [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
Referral and AG’s Opinion Arnold J in the English Court referred five questions to the CJEU, which the AG opined as follows: Question 1: Can an EU or national trade mark be declared invalid, in whole or in part, on the grounds that the specification of goods and services lack sufficient clarity and precision? [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
Referral and AG’s Opinion Arnold J in the English Court referred five questions to the CJEU, which the AG opined as follows: Question 1: Can an EU or national trade mark be declared invalid, in whole or in part, on the grounds that the specification of goods and services lack sufficient clarity and precision? [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
Arnold J of the UK Patents Court to conclude in [2018] EWHC 2416 (Pat) that one part of the two-pronged test established by the CJEU in Teva v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A… [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
* Can Unified Patent Court and national laws of infringement diverge? [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In this respect this Kat has pondered whether Mr Justice Arnold’s decision Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) is a good one in respect of the interpretation of Swiss style claims (Katpost here). [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:25 am
This was a bill that was vetoed by then-governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More food for… [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
Liberties Union, 535 U.S. 564, 573, 122 S.Ct. 1700, 152 L.Ed.2d 771 (2002), quoting Bolger v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
At para [52] – [54], the court recognised and accepted the following points: · Under Article 4(3) of the Consolidated Treaty on the European Union and the provisions of the CTM Regulation, OHIM’s status is equivalent to that of a national court; thus sincere co-operation must be respected -- even where there are overlapping jurisdictions (citing Ryanair Holdings plc v Office of Fair Trading [2012]EWCA… [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
When Arnold arrived in Sacramento (I know this from an informed Republican friend), he held serious but private talks with the conservative leaders who control the GOP in California, much as they do nationally. [read post]
