Search for: "Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Appeal of" Results 21 - 40 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2010, 12:16 pm
Co., 303 AD2d 987; Matter of Nationwide Ins. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 5:31 pm
Marcus, 12 AD3d 329 (1st Dept. 2004) 41 daysMatter of Nationwide Mut. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:20 am
Co., 1 NY3d at 69-70 [a 48-day delay was unreasonable as a matter of law]; Matter of Nationwide Mut. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
In addition, "the term should . . . be interpreted in a manner favoring coverage, as should any ambiguous language in an insurance policy" (Rohlin v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:56 pm
The phrase 'used in whole or in part for business purposes' is ambiguous in the absence of any qualifying language . . . and therefore must be construed in favor of the insureds" (Roland v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34; Young v Nationwide Mut. [read post]