Search for: "Neal v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 625
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2010, 2:15 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s a link to the petitioner’s reply to the SG’s opposition to the cert petition in Neal v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 7:46 am by Daily Record Staff
Administrative law — Conditional release from DHMH — Substantial evidence Appellant, Neal Manning, applied for conditional release from the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene under Section 114(c) of the Criminal Procedure Article of the Maryland Code. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s a link to the SG’s opposition to the cert petition in Neal v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 8:29 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Split sentence Appellant, Troy Neal Edwards, appeals the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence by the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:49 am by Dwight Sullivan
As indicated here, yesterday the Supreme Court asked the Solicitor General to respond to the cert petition in Neal v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:45 pm by Dwight Sullivan
We previously noted the cert petition in Neal v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 5:47 am
Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006), and his representation of the State of Louisiana when it sought rehearing in Kennedy v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 3:29 am by Neal Davis
Notably, Davis was a major player in a Supreme Court case focusing on Miranda Rights: Salinas v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:33 pm by Dwight Sullivan
NEAL, 68 M.J. 289 (C.A.A.F. 2010), AND UNITED STATES v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:46 pm by Dwight Sullivan
First, there’s this post on the Puckett & Faraj website by LTC Lakin’s civilian defense counsel, Neal Puckett, further discussing the case.  [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:54 am
Although MCL 400.106(5) permits the state to recover the full amount of its Medicaid lien from the total amount of a settlement or judgment in a medical-related tort action, federal law limits recovery to the amount that is designated specifically for medical expenses, according to the Michigan Court of Appeals in Neal v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:22 am by Neal Davis
Listing seven criticisms of the government’s handling of the questioning, Judge Ellison said: “Stated simply, no one acting in the name of the United States should ever engage in such conduct – deceptive at best, and also seriously coercive. [read post]