Search for: "Neal v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2013, 6:01 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
Why on earth “would it have looked bad” for the Solicitor General to be involved in the most important case the United States has argued in a decade, where the entire DOJ was coordinating a defense from day one? [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am by Rachel Sachs
Jackson filed her brief  in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:18 am by Neal Davis
That is when the United States Supreme Court struck down the state’s anti-sodomy law in Lawrence v Texas, a case arising after sheriff’s deputies in the Houston area charged 2 men with a misdemeanor for having sex in an apartment. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:18 am by Neal Davis
That is when the United States Supreme Court struck down the state’s anti-sodomy law in Lawrence v Texas, a case arising after sheriff’s deputies in the Houston area charged 2 men with a misdemeanor for having sex in an apartment. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Despite the recent announcement that Volkswagen had agreed to a $14.7 billion settlement with the United States arising out of allegations made by the U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:51 am by Howard M. Wasserman
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Sarah Harrington argued for the United States as amicus curiae in support of Chester. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
In his Proclamation 5517 (1986), he justified this exclusion on the ground that he “found that the unrestricted entry into the United States as immigrants by Cuban citizens would . . . be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am by Peter Margulies
The revised EO applies only to noncitizen visa applicants with no previous ties to the United States—a group with scant, if any, statutory or constitutional rights. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:22 am by Kali Borkoski
Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal will argue on behalf of the United States in Richmond. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Neal Kaytal of the Solicitor General's office will argue as amicus curiae for the United States in support of the petitioners. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am by Christine Corcos
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 7:23 am by Simon Lester
Whether USMCA overall is better or worse overall than the original NAFTA will not be fully clear until USMCA has been in force for some time, and different stakeholders (e.g., automotive producers versus labor unions, the United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am by Howard Friedman
Kennedy, (5th Cir., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]