Search for: "Neal v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 425
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2019, 9:04 am by Steven Cohen
O’Neal is a wage-and-hour consultant with forty years of experience working in the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Rick Pildes
  The flag-burning decision, Texas v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
The PEW Research Group’s surveys of public opinion in the United States document the fundamental regime change that has taken place over the last half century. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
”  One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:53 am by Scott Bomboy
  In his 1897 report to the American Historical Association, Herman V. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  If the Supreme Court is an elite largely influenced by elites, the United States is not a democracy in the classical Aristotelean sense, but a mixed regime where aristocrats and plebes both participate in governance. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:49 am by Eugene Volokh
" This is similar to the standard offered by Jeff Wall, who argued for the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:32 pm by Amy Howe
The question arose in the case of Hamid Mohamed Ahmed Ali Rehaif, a citizen of the United Arab Emirates, who came to the United States on a student visa but was dismissed from school – and, as a result, was no longer in the country legally. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
There is an abundant historical record supporting the conclusion that the United States Constitution was promoted by a core group of political leaders in order to strengthen the national government, and that the Constitution was understood by the people during the ratification debate to do just that. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
United States in the context of the past eight years of Obamacare litigation. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In response (and also in the Times), Stephen Vladeck pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]