Search for: "Near v. Minnesota" Results 41 - 60 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2011, 6:00 am by Marc Edelman
District Court for the District of Minnesota concluded in McNeil v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:51 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
She lives in rural Wisconsin; and, for portions of each year, in a water-access cabin near the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in Minnesota. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
However, the Minnesota Supreme Court subsequently considered the admissibility of retrograde extrapolation testimony in State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
However, the Minnesota Supreme Court subsequently considered the admissibility of retrograde extrapolation testimony in State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:11 pm by LundgrenJohnson
The Minnesota Supreme has rejected the “but-for” causation test because “it converts events both near and far, which merely set the stage for an accident, into a convoluted series of ‘causes’ of the accident. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
Griffin, 2013 WL 3929143 (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2013). [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 3:07 pm
On "The Day the Music Died" (February 3, 1959), the three headline acts in the line-up of the traveling 'Winter Dance Party'—Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens, and The Big Bopper—were killed, along with 21-year-old pilot Roger Peterson, in the crash of a 1947 Beechcraft Bonanza v-tailed aircraft (registration #N3974N) near Clear Lake, Iowa, while en route to the next show on the tour itinerary in Moorhead, Minnesota. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
We're so used to adverse decisions out of the District of Minnesota - what with the defibrillator MDLs "distinguishing" Buckman into near oblivion, and the heart valve MDL persisting in certifying classes despite being told not to by the Eighth Circuit - that good news from that district is like a breath of fresh air.That's what we got recently in In re Baycol Products Litigation, 2007 WL 2004432 (D. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:07 am by MBettman
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote this in her separate concurrence in the landmark case of Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]