Search for: "Nebraska v. Wyoming" Results 41 - 60 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am by Sharon Armstrong
A few weeks ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in The University of South Carolina v. the University of Southern California in South Carolina’s appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
  Other states exempt anything "permitted" by the relevant regulatory body (Arkansas, Connecticut, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
 Two states, Nebraska and South Dakota, use a slight-gross system of comparative fault. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Sandy Levinson
”  When Larry Lessig and I taught a seminar on “Article V Conventions” at the Harvard Law School three years ago, I developed the view, at least half-seriously, that Article V was purposely written as a Pandora’s box that would dissuade anyone from every actually supporting a new constitutional convention. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:26 pm by Andis Kaulins
Wyoming: Cowboys favored by 3 Our call: Wyoming 31-27    Result: - Akron v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
Other bills limiting what can be labeled as meat are under consideration in Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm by Hanna May
” On November 10, 2021, Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming challenged the CMS vaccine mandate in the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Robbins Co., 577 P.2d 975, 978 (Wash. 1978).Wyoming: Rohde v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 3:51 pm by New Hampshire Employment Law Letter
In late February, the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a ruling in favor of an employer in EEOC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Cari Rincker
The 13 states, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming, claimed that the new WOTUS rule is a threat to state sovereignty because it asserts federal jurisdiction over wetlands and waters that should be subject to state government control. [read post]