Search for: "Neema Singh Guliani, Naureen Shah"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
Neema Singh Guliani from the ACLU and Naureen Shah from Amnesty International argue in a response essay that the CLOUD Act puts the privacy and security of individuals, particularly human rights activists at risk. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
Neema Singh Guliani from the ACLU and Naureen Shah from Amnesty International argue in a response essay that the CLOUD Act puts the privacy and security of individuals, particularly human rights activists at risk. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 7:18 am
Neema Singh Guliani and Naureen Shah contended that the act would harm these protections and put human rights activists, religious minorities, and others in danger. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
In a post last week, Neema Singh Guliani of the ACLU and Naureen Shah of Amnesty International disagreed with our earlier arguments as to why the CLOUD Act is good for privacy and human rights. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 4:43 am
Jennifer Daskal and Peter Swire rebutted Neema Singh Guliani and Naureen Shah’s response to their contention that the CLOUD Act will improve privacy and civil liberties protections. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jennifer Daskal and Peter Swire responded to Neema Singh Guliani and Naureen Shah’s rebuttal of their assertion that the CLOUD Act will enhance privacy and civil liberties protections. [read post]
