Search for: "Neil S. Siegel" Results 81 - 100 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2012, 7:21 pm by vm40@duke.edu
“Arguments by liberal scholars who care about constitutional text and history, such as Neil Siegel of Duke Law School, were reflected in Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion about the taxing power,” wrote Jeffrey Rosen in The New Republic. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 2:10 pm by Deborah Schander
Although the exact parties have changed over the years (with Shuster’s and Siegels heirs eventually on one side and various iterations of Warner Bros. and DC on the other), the question of who-owns-what is still not settled. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, by Neil S. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:00 pm by JB
Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40thand Lawrence’s 10th AnniversariesJanuary 18-19, 2013UCLA School of LawThe American Constitution Society, the Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law, the Yale Information Society Project, and the Program for the Study of Reproductive Justice announce the upcoming co-sponsored conference, Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrence’s 10thAnniversaries, to take place January 18-19, 2013, at… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm by Jessie Hill
Martinez, as well as essays by Rick Pildes on PCAOB, Neil Siegel on McDonald v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Law):Neil Weinstock Netanel, Introduction to: From Maimonides to Microsoft: The Jewish Law of Copyright Since the Birth of Print, (Oxford University Press 2016).Asim Jusic, SAS v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:30 am by James Romoser
Supreme Court takes aim at separation of church and state (Lawrence Hurley & Andrew Chung, Reuters) The Lawlessness of the Dobbs Decision (Dahlia Lithwick & Neil S. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:00 am by Karen Tani
Readers may be interested in this upcoming conference at UCLA School of Law: Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrence’s 10th Anniversaries, January 18-19, 2013. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 11:24 am by NCC Staff
The Supreme Court Is Avoiding Talking About Race By Neil Siegel, David W. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:48 am by Jonathan R. Siegel
Siegel is Professor of Law at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:07 am by Jim Sedor
” by Neil Thomas for Texas Tribune Elections Maine: “Maine Regularly Sells Voter Data It Denied to Feds” by Scott Thistle for Governing [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:47 am
Participants include Susannah Pollvogt (Washburn), Neil Siegel (Duke), William Araiza (Brooklyn), Russell Robinson (Berkeley), Justin Marceau (Denver), and me. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 1:23 pm
Professor Neil Siegel has this article in the Duke Law Journal about the two school integration cases that will be argued on Monday. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:36 pm
- Boston attorney Kevin Whitaker on his blog, Privacy & Policy The Heritage Foundation Deliberately Misleads (or in the Alternative is Embarrassingly Wrong) on Estate Tax Repeal - Florida estate planning attorney David Shulman on his South Florida Estate Planning Law blog How to Shop for Safe Toys During the Holidays - Atlanta lawyer Lisa Siegel of Katz, Stepp & Miller on their Georgia Injury Law Blog Couple Seeks Custody of Indian Child Despite Federal Law - Texas attorney Michelle… [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Or BassokIn a recent post, Neil Siegel describes a “major concern expressed during the partisan gerrymandering litigation before the Supreme Court over the past two terms”— “that the Court’s public legitimacy may suffer if it holds that federal courts may adjudicate the merits of political gerrymandering claims. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 7:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The Washington Post's Robert Barnes reports on recent remarks by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg during her annual "conversation" with Duke Law's Neil Seigel. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Amanda Frost
  In an essay entitled “Four Constitutional Limits that the Minimum Coverage Provision Respects,” Neil Siegel tackles this argument by listing four restrictions on Congress’s Commerce Clause power that he asserts are consistent with the view that individual mandate is constitutional. [read post]