Search for: "Neil Siegel"
Results 61 - 80
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2016, 5:48 pm
" Law professor Neil S. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am
” At Balkinization, Neil Siegel summarizes his recent contribution to a Yale Law Journal symposium on Justice Samuel Alito, concluding “that, especially in light of Justice Scalia’s passing, Justice Alito has become the primary judicial voice of the many millions of Americans who appear to be losing the culture wars, including in conflicts over gay rights, women’s access to reproductive healthcare, religious exemptions, and affirmative action. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
: Physicians and the Duty to Refer, (McGill Journal of Law and Health 2016 10(2)).Neil Siegel, The Distinctive Role of Justice Samuel Alito: From a Politics of Restoration to a Politics of Dissent, (Yale Law Journal Forum, Vol. 126, p.164 (2016)).Fatmir Halili & Arif Riza, The Betrothal and Marriage - According to Islamic Law (Shariah) and Under the Secular System, (October 15, 2016).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Gregory M. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
As noted previously, I'm publishing a few discussion notes from the forthcoming supplement to the Brest Levinson casebook, which I prepare every summer following the end of the Supreme Court Term.This year I decided to write a short note for students taking them through the issues in the controversy over the appointment of Justice Scalia's successor. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am
Commentary comes from Neil Siegel at The Hill. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Law):Neil Weinstock Netanel, Introduction to: From Maimonides to Microsoft: The Jewish Law of Copyright Since the Birth of Print, (Oxford University Press 2016).Asim Jusic, SAS v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:11 pm
Lopez (2015) to revisit the Rehnquist Court’s federalism revolution.The colloquy will continue the conversation about the Rehnquist Court as well as take up federalism developments in the Roberts Court and the possible impact (from a federalism perspective) of a new Court member following the death of Justice Scalia.Besides myself, participants at the colloquy include Ernest Young and Neil Siegel (Duke), Rick Hills (NYU), Jud Campbell (Stanford), and Bill Marshall, Mary-Rose… [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
At Balkinization, Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel analyze what role, if any, “constitutional conventions” should play in the selection of a successor. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:33 pm
Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel The timing of the death of Justice Antonin Scalia is prompting much discussion—for example, here, here, here, and here—about whether there are “constitutional conventions” relevant to efforts to fill his seat—or to oppose filling his seat—before the next presidential election. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 10:00 am
Bradley and Neil Siegel, Duke University School of Law, have posted Historical Gloss, Constitutional Conventions, and the Judicial Separation of Powers: Scholars have increasingly focused on the relevance of post-Founding historical practice to discern the separation of powers between Congress and the executive branch, and the Supreme Court has recently endorsed the relevance of such practice. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 3:34 am
” And Amy Wax and Neil Siegel discuss the case in a podcast for Constitution Daily. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Special thanks to Professor Neil S. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
On Wednesday, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg spoke with one of her former clerks, Neil S. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:16 am
If functional concerns are stripped out of the political question doctrine in the service of formalism, they may well reemerge at the merits stage, something that Neil Siegel and I suggested in a recent article on Noel Canning in the Supreme Court Review. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
Professors Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel have described Griswold as “offer[ing] women the most significant constitutional protection since the Nineteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote, constitutional protection as important as the cases prohibiting sex discrimination that the Court would decide in the next decade – perhaps even more so. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:20 am
In addition to Dodson’s own essay, the book includes contributions by, among others, Thomas Goldstein, Lani Guinier, Robert Katzmann, Herma Hill Kay, Linda Kerber, Dahlia Lithwick, Neil and Reva Siegel, Nina Totenberg, and Joan Williams. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Brown DorothyABrown Emory Kara Bruce ProfessorKBruce Toledo Matthew Bruckner Prof_Bruckner Howard Sam Brunson smbrnsn Loyola Chicago Ryan Bubb ryan_bubb NYU Neil Buchanan NeilHBuchanan George Washington Trevor Buck trevbuck De Montfort U (UK) Alafair Burke alafairburke Hofstra Beth Burkstrand-Reid beth_burkstrand Nebraska Kylie Burns snailsinbottles Griffith (Australia) Sarah Burstein design_law Oklahoma Michael Burstein mburstein Cardozo Naomi Cahn NaomiCahn George… [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 2:24 pm
Siegel, Neil S. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:38 pm
The title of this post comes from this recent paper by Professors Neil Siegel and Reva Siegel, the abstract of which states: Challenges to federal law requiring insurance coverage of contraception are occurring on the eve of the 50th Anniversary... [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am
Brown DorothyABrown Emory Kara Bruce ProfessorKBruce Toledo Matthew Bruckner Prof_Bruckner Howard Sam Brunson smbrnsn Loyola Chicago Ryan Bubb ryan_bubb NYU Neil Buchanan NeilHBuchanan George Washington Trevor Buck trevbuck De Montfort U (UK) Alafair Burke alafairburke Hofstra Beth Burkstrand-Reid beth_burkstrand Nebraska Kylie Burns snailsinbottles Griffith (Australia) Sarah Burstein design_law Oklahoma Naomi Cahn NaomiCahn George Washington Gillian Calder gilliancalder Victoria Stephen… [read post]
