Search for: "Neil Siegel" Results 101 - 120 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2014, 5:45 am by Guest Blogger
”)This reliance on animus in the sexual orientation cases may represent, as Neil Siegel has used the term in other contexts, a “way station” to application of traditional equal protection doctrines (suspect classification analysis and explicit application of heightened scrutiny) to sexual minorities. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:33 pm by Neil Siegel
Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel The timing of the death of Justice Antonin Scalia is prompting much discussion—for example, here, here, here, and here—about whether there are “constitutional conventions” relevant to efforts to fill his seat—or to oppose filling his seat—before the next presidential election. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:26 am by Marc DeGirolami
SECOND ADDENDUM: Neil Siegel has something on this as well (referring in his post to a forthcoming Va. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
Commentary on the Court’s Commerce Clause reasoning comes from Neil Siegel at Balkinization and Randy Barnett at Reason (video). [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
*Neil Siegel analyzes the cert denials as a form of persuading rather than coercing lower courts to strike down same-sex marriage bans, a “passive virtue” (Alexander Bickel’s phrase) that the Court adopts in times of constitutional transition. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:40 am by Ilya Somin
Among the many other contributors are Jack Balkin, Erwin Chemerinsky, Richard Epstein, Charles Fried, Jamal Greene, Linda Greenhouse, Andrew Koppelman, Neil Siegel, Larry Solum, and VC co-bloggers Jonathan Adler and Randy Barnett. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:47 pm by Amanda Frost
Professor Neil Siegel also rejects the umpire analogy, using the Supreme Court’s case law on race conscious student assignment to make his point.  [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 11:59 am by BDG
(And let me now give credit to Bob Cooter, Rick Hills, and Neil Siegel for laying out most of the intellectual groundwork for this post.  [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 3:34 am by Amy Howe
”  And Amy Wax and Neil Siegel discuss the case in a podcast for Constitution Daily. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
March 4, 12:30-2 PM, Duke Law School, Rm. 3037, Durham, NC:  "How Federalism Protects Sanctuary Cities," panel on "Federalism and Sanctuary Cities" (with Duke law professors Ernie Young and Neil Siegel). [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:04 am by SHG
“I can say that my two newest colleagues are very decent and very smart individuals,” she said Wednesday at an event in Washington, D.C., hosted by Duke Law as she answered questions from Neil Siegel, a law professor and one of her former law clerks. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Guest Blogger
As Neil Siegel (whose constitutional riff is, among the contributors here, closest to mine) appropriately puts it, I am (like him) “a structuralist at heart. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel            The constitutional text looms large in the recess appointments case, NLRB v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm by Randy Barnett
[Generally cleaned up text and added an update] [UPDATE:  From the abstract it looks like Neil Siegel and Bob Cooter anticipated Chief Justice Roberts approach in their paper, Not the Power to Destroy: A Theory of the Tax Power for a Court that Limits the Commerce Power and may even have provided him with the road map for his analysis.   [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:44 am by Steve Lubet
 Professors Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel have described Griswold as “offer[ing] women the most significant constitutional protection since the Nineteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote, constitutional protection as important as the cases prohibiting sex discrimination that the Court would decide in the next decade – perhaps even more so. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:20 am
Neil Siegel, in his 2005 critique of Sunstein's work on minimalism - A Theory in Search of a Court, and itself: Judicial Minimalism at the Supreme Court Bar, available online here - has written that "pre-empirically, it appears more likely that whatever costs the Court saves itself by taking a minimalist path will be outweighed by the costs incurred by litigants, lower courts, and, political bodies". [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:20 pm by David Lat
As Justice Scalia explained during an appearance at Duke Law School:[Professor Neil] Siegel, a constitutional law scholar and former Supreme Court clerk, asked Scalia to expound on his statement that he was “an originalist, not a nut.” [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
 Commentary comes from Neil Siegel at The Hill. [read post]