Search for: "Neil Siegel" Results 101 - 120 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2020, 11:24 am by NCC Staff
The Supreme Court Is Avoiding Talking About Race By Neil Siegel, David W. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm by Howard Friedman
: Physicians and the Duty to Refer, (McGill Journal of Law and Health 2016 10(2)).Neil Siegel, The Distinctive Role of Justice Samuel Alito: From a Politics of Restoration to a Politics of Dissent, (Yale Law Journal Forum, Vol. 126, p.164 (2016)).Fatmir Halili & Arif Riza, The Betrothal and Marriage - According to Islamic Law (Shariah) and Under the Secular System, (October 15, 2016).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Gregory M. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Law):Neil Weinstock Netanel, Introduction to: From Maimonides to Microsoft: The Jewish Law of Copyright Since the Birth of Print, (Oxford University Press 2016).Asim Jusic, SAS v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, by Neil S. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm by Jessie Hill
Martinez, as well as essays by Rick Pildes on PCAOB, Neil Siegel on McDonald v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:47 am
Participants include Susannah Pollvogt (Washburn), Neil Siegel (Duke), William Araiza (Brooklyn), Russell Robinson (Berkeley), Justin Marceau (Denver), and me. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:30 am by James Romoser
Siegel, Slate) Dobbs, Roe and the Myth of ‘Bodily Autonomy’ (Tish Harrison Warren, The New York Times) Ruling overturning Roe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 1:23 pm
Professor Neil Siegel has this article in the Duke Law Journal about the two school integration cases that will be argued on Monday. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 7:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This bit about the newest justices caught my eye: Siegel noted that President Gerald Ford had said he had looked for the best legal mind in the country before selecting Stevens in 1975. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:36 pm
- Boston attorney Kevin Whitaker on his blog, Privacy & Policy The Heritage Foundation Deliberately Misleads (or in the Alternative is Embarrassingly Wrong) on Estate Tax Repeal - Florida estate planning attorney David Shulman on his South Florida Estate Planning Law blog How to Shop for Safe Toys During the Holidays - Atlanta lawyer Lisa Siegel of Katz, Stepp & Miller on their Georgia Injury Law Blog Couple Seeks Custody of Indian Child Despite Federal Law - Texas attorney Michelle… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Amanda Frost
”  Michael Dorf and Neil Siegel have posted an essay on SSRN, available here, arguing that the TAIA only bars suits that have the “immediate purpose” of restraining the collection of taxes. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:05 am by JB
The Internet and digital media, which blend traditional legal experts, journalists, commentators, and the general public, have, if anything, enhanced these features of American constitutional culture.The all-star cast of participants includes: Bruce Ackerman (Yale), Akhil Amar (Yale), Jack Balkin (Yale), Emily Bazelon (Yale, Slate), Joan Biskupic (Reuters News), Sujit Choudhry (NYU), Justin Driver (Texas, New Republic), Garrett Epps (University of Baltimore, American Prospect), Barry Friedman (NYU),… [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Thomas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, Forthcoming).Vivian Grosswald Curran, Reviving Human Rights Legislation After Kiobel, (American Journal of International Law, Vol. 107, p. 858, 2013).Neil Siegel, Federalism as a Way Station: Windsor as Exemplar of Doctrine in Motion, (February 14, 2014). [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:48 am by Jonathan R. Siegel
Siegel is Professor of Law at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:58 pm by JB
Marty Lederman has offered a splendid analysis of the individual mandate issues here, and, of course, readers of this blog know that Andy Koppelman, Neil Siegel, and I have gone over the doctrinal arguments many times before.So for a change of pace, I point out that, if we use regime theory in political science, the most likely prediction is that a majority of the Justices will defend the basic commitments of the current constitutional regime, which is the New Deal/civil rights… [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:19 am
I understand Neil Siegel to be making largely a mode 1 argument. [read post]