Search for: "Neil Siegel" Results 101 - 120 of 211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Guest Blogger
As Neil Siegel (whose constitutional riff is, among the contributors here, closest to mine) appropriately puts it, I am (like him) “a structuralist at heart. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:20 am by JB
  Participants will include Sandy Levinson (Texas), Neil Siegel (Duke), Gillian Metzger (Columbia), Michael McConnell (Stanford), Rick Hills (NYU), and Ernie Young (Duke). [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am by JB
(Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel point out that the case can—and should—be read more narrowly to exclude only some pregnancy discrimination, but unfortunately, that is not how courts have read it since.)Geduldig’s vision of social reality divided the world not between men and women but—I am not making this up— between “pregnant and non-pregnant persons. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:35 am by Guest Blogger
Neil Siegel and Reva SiegelFor the Conference on Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrence’s 10th Anniversaries Roe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:00 am by Karen Tani
·         Dawn Johnsen, University of Indiana Maurer School of Law (moderator)·         Jack Balkin, Yale Law School·         Matt Coles, Equality Project, ACLU·         Neil Siegel, Duke University School of Law·         Reva Siegel, Yale… [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:00 pm by JB
·         Dawn Johnsen, University of Indiana Maurer School of Law (moderator)·         Jack Balkin, Yale Law School·         Matt Coles, Equality Project, ACLU·         Neil Siegel, Duke University School of Law·         Reva Siegel, Yale… [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 4:35 am by Lawrence Solum
Neil Siegel (Duke University - School of Law) has posted More Law than Politics: The Chief, The 'Mandate', Legality, and Statesmanship (The Health Care Case: The Supreme Court's Decision and Its Implications (Nathaniel Persily, Gillian E. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm by rmorgan
Robert Cooter quoted in The National Law Journal, June 4, 2012 In what some scholars consider the most important approach to understanding federalism and the Constitution in recent years, collective-action federalism is the brainchild of Neil Siegel of Duke Law School and Robert Cooter of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
A version of these will appear in the 2012 Supplement to Brest, Levinson, Balkin, Amar and Siegel, Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking (5th edition). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 11:09 am by Rick Hills
Neil Siegel has an interesting post at Balkinization against reading Congress' powers more narrowly when Congress invades so-called "areas of traditional state concern. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
Commentary on the Court’s Commerce Clause reasoning comes from Neil Siegel at Balkinization and Randy Barnett at Reason (video). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Paul Caron
Cooter (UC-Berkeley) & Neil Siegel (Duke), Not the Power to Destroy: A Theory of the Tax Power for a Court that Limits the Commerce Power, 98 Va. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am by Nabiha Syed
Sebelius, Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter discuss their theory of the tax power and how it justifies the Chief Justice’s analysis. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am by Nabiha Syed
Sebelius, Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter discuss their theory of the tax power and how it justifies the Chief Justice’s analysis. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am by Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter
Selvin Professor of Law at Berkeley Law School, and Neil Siegel, Professor of Law and Political Science at Duke Law School. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:58 am by Lawrence Solum
Neil Siegel (Duke University - School of Law) has posted Distinguishing the 'Truly National' from the 'Truly Local': Customary Allocation, Commercial Activity, and Collective Action on SSRN. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:21 pm by vm40@duke.edu
“Arguments by liberal scholars who care about constitutional text and history, such as Neil Siegel of Duke Law School, were reflected in Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion about the taxing power,” wrote Jeffrey Rosen in The New Republic. [read post]