Search for: "Neil Siegel" Results 121 - 140 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 7:20 pm by David Lat
As Justice Scalia explained during an appearance at Duke Law School:[Professor Neil] Siegel, a constitutional law scholar and former Supreme Court clerk, asked Scalia to expound on his statement that he was “an originalist, not a nut.” [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
 Commentary comes from Neil Siegel at The Hill. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am by Kiran Bhat
Cato@Liberty, David Koppel of the Volokh Conspiracy, and Jack Balkin, Neil Siegel, and Sandy Levinson at Balkinzation, all offer thoughts on a “limiting principle” for congressional power. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:11 pm
  Finally, we know that he named three people to act as co-executors for the estate:  John Branca, John McClain, and Barry Siegel. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” At Balkinization, Neil Siegel reacts to the description of the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate in Joan Biskupic’s recent biography of Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:00 pm
His opinion bore a remarkable similarity to an academic paper posted to SSRN by Robert Cooter and Neil Siegel, “Not the Power to Destroy: An Effects Theory of the Tax Power,” which had been downloaded 162 times at the time of the decision. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:20 am by Ilya Somin
Brian Galle, Neil Siegel, and my former colleague Max Stearns). [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
  Also at this blog, Suzanne Goldberg and Neil Siegel weighed in on the denials. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:53 am by Sam Bagenstos
Neil Siegel and others have offered arguments for upholding the mandate based on constitutional structure.   [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
At Verdict, Michael Dorf and Neil Siegel argue that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar the Court’s review of the individual mandate, but they add that, to resolve any doubt, “Congress should enact a special-purpose statute stating that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar pre-enforcement challenges to the minimum coverage provision until that provision actually goes into effect.”  [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 8:55 am by Ilya Somin
While Democrats have every right to respond to GOP nomination "hardball" in kind (and vice versa), court-packing would go far beyond that for reasons well explained by liberal legal scholars Noah Feldman and Neil Siegel. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
.”  At Balkinization, Neil Siegel calls for clear confidentiality rules for clerks. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
 At Balkinization, Neil Siegel implores the justices not to “’just look away’” from the real motivations behind the decision. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am by JB
(Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel point out that the case can—and should—be read more narrowly to exclude only some pregnancy discrimination, but unfortunately, that is not how courts have read it since.)Geduldig’s vision of social reality divided the world not between men and women but—I am not making this up— between “pregnant and non-pregnant persons. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:20 am by Barbara Babcock
In addition to Dodson’s own essay, the book includes contributions by, among others, Thomas Goldstein, Lani Guinier, Robert Katzmann, Herma Hill Kay, Linda Kerber, Dahlia Lithwick, Neil and Reva Siegel, Nina Totenberg, and Joan Williams. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:35 pm by Guest Blogger
For one thing, the Court could easily also set out some limiting principles on the taxing power, along the lines sketched nicely by Bob Cooter and Neil Siegel, that would be fully consistent with § 5000A. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:16 am by Curtis Bradley
If functional concerns are stripped out of the political question doctrine in the service of formalism, they may well reemerge at the merits stage, something that Neil Siegel and I suggested in a recent article on Noel Canning in the Supreme Court Review. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
Neil Siegel and I elaborated this argument earlier in the year in the Yale Law Journal Online. 2) Tomorrow the Court will turn to the merits of the challenges to the minimum coverage provision.   [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” At Balkinization, Neil Siegel summarizes his recent contribution to a Yale Law Journal symposium on Justice Samuel Alito, concluding “that, especially in light of Justice Scalia’s passing, Justice Alito has become the primary judicial voice of the many millions of Americans who appear to be losing the culture wars, including in conflicts over gay rights, women’s access to reproductive healthcare, religious exemptions, and affirmative action. [read post]