Search for: "Neil Siegel" Results 161 - 180 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm by Randy Barnett
[Generally cleaned up text and added an update] [UPDATE:  From the abstract it looks like Neil Siegel and Bob Cooter anticipated Chief Justice Roberts approach in their paper, Not the Power to Destroy: A Theory of the Tax Power for a Court that Limits the Commerce Power and may even have provided him with the road map for his analysis.   [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:44 am by Steve Lubet
 Professors Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel have described Griswold as “offer[ing] women the most significant constitutional protection since the Nineteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote, constitutional protection as important as the cases prohibiting sex discrimination that the Court would decide in the next decade – perhaps even more so. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:20 am
Neil Siegel, in his 2005 critique of Sunstein's work on minimalism - A Theory in Search of a Court, and itself: Judicial Minimalism at the Supreme Court Bar, available online here - has written that "pre-empirically, it appears more likely that whatever costs the Court saves itself by taking a minimalist path will be outweighed by the costs incurred by litigants, lower courts, and, political bodies". [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:20 pm by David Lat
As Justice Scalia explained during an appearance at Duke Law School:[Professor Neil] Siegel, a constitutional law scholar and former Supreme Court clerk, asked Scalia to expound on his statement that he was “an originalist, not a nut.” [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
 Commentary comes from Neil Siegel at The Hill. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am by Kiran Bhat
Cato@Liberty, David Koppel of the Volokh Conspiracy, and Jack Balkin, Neil Siegel, and Sandy Levinson at Balkinzation, all offer thoughts on a “limiting principle” for congressional power. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:11 pm
  Finally, we know that he named three people to act as co-executors for the estate:  John Branca, John McClain, and Barry Siegel. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” At Balkinization, Neil Siegel reacts to the description of the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate in Joan Biskupic’s recent biography of Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:00 pm
His opinion bore a remarkable similarity to an academic paper posted to SSRN by Robert Cooter and Neil Siegel, “Not the Power to Destroy: An Effects Theory of the Tax Power,” which had been downloaded 162 times at the time of the decision. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:20 am by Ilya Somin
Brian Galle, Neil Siegel, and my former colleague Max Stearns). [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
  Also at this blog, Suzanne Goldberg and Neil Siegel weighed in on the denials. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:53 am by Sam Bagenstos
Neil Siegel and others have offered arguments for upholding the mandate based on constitutional structure.   [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
At Verdict, Michael Dorf and Neil Siegel argue that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar the Court’s review of the individual mandate, but they add that, to resolve any doubt, “Congress should enact a special-purpose statute stating that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar pre-enforcement challenges to the minimum coverage provision until that provision actually goes into effect.”  [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 8:55 am by Ilya Somin
While Democrats have every right to respond to GOP nomination "hardball" in kind (and vice versa), court-packing would go far beyond that for reasons well explained by liberal legal scholars Noah Feldman and Neil Siegel. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
.”  At Balkinization, Neil Siegel calls for clear confidentiality rules for clerks. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
 At Balkinization, Neil Siegel implores the justices not to “’just look away’” from the real motivations behind the decision. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am by JB
(Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel point out that the case can—and should—be read more narrowly to exclude only some pregnancy discrimination, but unfortunately, that is not how courts have read it since.)Geduldig’s vision of social reality divided the world not between men and women but—I am not making this up— between “pregnant and non-pregnant persons. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:20 am by Barbara Babcock
In addition to Dodson’s own essay, the book includes contributions by, among others, Thomas Goldstein, Lani Guinier, Robert Katzmann, Herma Hill Kay, Linda Kerber, Dahlia Lithwick, Neil and Reva Siegel, Nina Totenberg, and Joan Williams. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:35 pm by Guest Blogger
For one thing, the Court could easily also set out some limiting principles on the taxing power, along the lines sketched nicely by Bob Cooter and Neil Siegel, that would be fully consistent with § 5000A. [read post]