Search for: "Neil Siegel"
Results 161 - 180
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
” At Balkinization, Neil Siegel reacts to the description of the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate in Joan Biskupic’s recent biography of Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:11 pm
Finally, we know that he named three people to act as co-executors for the estate: John Branca, John McClain, and Barry Siegel. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am
Commentary comes from Neil Siegel at The Hill. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 1:47 pm
Signers also include a large number of prominent center and left legal scholars (including Laurence Tribe, Martha Minow, Neil Siegel, and Rebecca Zietlow, among many others), and several prominent experts on impeachment, such as Frank Bowman and Brian Kalt (author of what is the best-known and by far the most thorough academic article on the subject of impeaching former officials). [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 8:55 am
While Democrats have every right to respond to GOP nomination "hardball" in kind (and vice versa), court-packing would go far beyond that for reasons well explained by liberal legal scholars Noah Feldman and Neil Siegel. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
At Balkinization, Neil Siegel implores the justices not to “’just look away’” from the real motivations behind the decision. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
.” At Balkinization, Neil Siegel calls for clear confidentiality rules for clerks. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
(Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel point out that the case can—and should—be read more narrowly to exclude only some pregnancy discrimination, but unfortunately, that is not how courts have read it since.)Geduldig’s vision of social reality divided the world not between men and women but—I am not making this up— between “pregnant and non-pregnant persons. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:56 am
The equality arguments summarized by Professor Reva Siegel and Professor Neil Siegel (and here by just RS) recognize a "bona fide interest in protecting potential life. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am
Curtis Bradley and Neil S. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 10:04 am
by Neil H. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
(2009) · Clay Shirky, Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age (2010) · Nick Bilton, I Live in the Future & Here’s How It Works (2010) · Kevin Kelly, What Technology Wants (2010) · Neil [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
At Verdict, Michael Dorf and Neil Siegel argue that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar the Court’s review of the individual mandate, but they add that, to resolve any doubt, “Congress should enact a special-purpose statute stating that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar pre-enforcement challenges to the minimum coverage provision until that provision actually goes into effect. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:20 am
In addition to Dodson’s own essay, the book includes contributions by, among others, Thomas Goldstein, Lani Guinier, Robert Katzmann, Herma Hill Kay, Linda Kerber, Dahlia Lithwick, Neil and Reva Siegel, Nina Totenberg, and Joan Williams. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:35 pm
For one thing, the Court could easily also set out some limiting principles on the taxing power, along the lines sketched nicely by Bob Cooter and Neil Siegel, that would be fully consistent with § 5000A. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am
” At Balkinization, Neil Siegel summarizes his recent contribution to a Yale Law Journal symposium on Justice Samuel Alito, concluding “that, especially in light of Justice Scalia’s passing, Justice Alito has become the primary judicial voice of the many millions of Americans who appear to be losing the culture wars, including in conflicts over gay rights, women’s access to reproductive healthcare, religious exemptions, and affirmative action. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
Cato@Liberty, David Koppel of the Volokh Conspiracy, and Jack Balkin, Neil Siegel, and Sandy Levinson at Balkinzation, all offer thoughts on a “limiting principle” for congressional power. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:16 am
If functional concerns are stripped out of the political question doctrine in the service of formalism, they may well reemerge at the merits stage, something that Neil Siegel and I suggested in a recent article on Noel Canning in the Supreme Court Review. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:09 am
In March 2020, Justice Neil Gorsuch suggested that the courts, “charged with the independent and neutral interpretation of the laws Congress has enacted,” should not defer what he called “bureaucratic pirouetting. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
Neil Siegel and I elaborated this argument earlier in the year in the Yale Law Journal Online. 2) Tomorrow the Court will turn to the merits of the challenges to the minimum coverage provision. [read post]
