Search for: "Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 9:05 pm
Cooter (UC-Berkeley) & Neil Siegel (Duke), Not the Power to Destroy: A Theory of the Tax Power for a Court that Limits the Commerce Power: Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Cooter (UC-Berkeley) & Neil Siegel (Duke), Not the Power to Destroy: A Theory of the Tax Power for a Court that Limits the Commerce Power, 98 Va. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:45 am
Robert Cooter (UC Berkeley Law) & Neil Siegel (Duke University School of Law) have posted Collective Action Internationalism on SSRN. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:20 am
Cooter (University of California, Berkeley - School of Law) & Neil Siegel (Duke University - School of Law) have posted Not the Power to Destroy: A Theory of the Tax Power for a Court that Limits the Commerce Power on SSRN. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:29 pm
Cooter and Neil Siegel (University of California, Berkeley - School of Law and Duke University - School of Law) have posted Collective Action Federalism: A General Theory of Article I, Section 8 (Stanford Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm
Robert Cooter quoted in The National Law Journal, June 4, 2012 In what some scholars consider the most important approach to understanding federalism and the Constitution in recent years, collective-action federalism is the brainchild of Neil Siegel of Duke Law School and Robert Cooter of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Robert Cooter & Neil Siegel, Collective Action Federalism: A General Theory of Article I, Section 8, 63 Stanford L. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:05 pm
(Ilya Somin) Co-blogger Jonathan Adler points out several weaknesses in the collective action theory approach to interpreting constitutional federalism advocated by a number of academics, most notably Robert Cooter and Neil Siegel. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
It so happens that I recently reviewed Robert Cooter and Neigl Siegel’s outstanding article “Collective Action Federalism” on Jotwell, a website where legal scholars review important new scholarship. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
Cooter and Siegel make a sophisticated argument that following the principle of Resolution VI would achieve beneficial results. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 9:40 pm
His theory of collective action federalism, developed with Robert Cooter of U.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:01 am
Participants will include Matthew Adler, Jack Balkin, Stuart Benjamin, James Boyle, Erwin Chemerinsky, Guy Charles, Robert Cooter, Mark Hall, Gillian Metzger, Abigail Moncrieff, Arti Rai, Barak Richman, Theodore Ruger, Stephen Sachs, Neil Siegel, Ilya Somin, and Ernest Young.A description of the conference and a link to the conference agenda are available here.The event is open to the public. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:44 am
Neil Siegel (Duke University - School of Law) has posted Free Riding on Benevolence: Collective Action Federalism and the Individual Mandate on SSRN. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:07 am
Cooter & Neil Siegel. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:11 am
(Neil Siegel, guest-blogging) I thank Prof. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
(Neil Siegel, guest-blogging) I thank Eugene Volokh for inviting me to blog about my work in this highly regarded venue. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
Selvin Professor of Law at Berkeley Law School, and Neil Siegel, Professor of Law and Political Science at Duke Law School. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:21 pm
The decision appears to agree with a view of the tax power developed by Duke Law Professor Neil Siegel and UC Berkeley Law Professor Robert Cooter in a forthcoming law review article (read the article on SSRN; read a summary on Balkinization). [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:28 am
As Robert Cooter and I have recently articulated in Collective Action Federalism: A General Theory of Article I, Section 8, 63 Stan. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm
[Generally cleaned up text and added an update] [UPDATE: From the abstract it looks like Neil Siegel and Bob Cooter anticipated Chief Justice Roberts approach in their paper, Not the Power to Destroy: A Theory of the Tax Power for a Court that Limits the Commerce Power and may even have provided him with the road map for his analysis. [read post]
