Search for: "Nelson Tebbe and Micah Schwartzman"
Results 41 - 56
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2013, 2:11 pm
” (I quote here a Slate piece by Micah Schwartzman & Nelson Tebbe, though the argument was also made in much more detail in this law review article by Fred Gedicks & Rebecca Van Tassell.) [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Calculations may also be specific to particular subject areas; Micah Schwartzman and I are in the process of constructing one such evaluation concerning the Establishment Clause. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:01 am
Two leading scholars of American law and religion, Micah Schwartzman and Nelson Tebbe, have proposed a reading of that work in which Justice Breyer's defections from "liberal" colleagues' strict-separationist dissents are evaluated as instances of "appeasement. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:39 pm
Nelson Tebbe, Micah Schwartzman, and Richard SchraggerYesterday, the Arkansas legislature passed a state RFRA and sent it to Governor Hutchinson. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:28 pm
Meanwhile, here at Balkinization, we’ve already published several important posts—this one by Joey Fishkin, and a series of three posts on the Establishment Clause questions raised in the case—here, hereand here—co-authored by Micah Schwartzman, Rich Schragger and Nelson Tebbe. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:56 am
Last August, Micah Schwartzman and Nelson Tebbe argued on the Slate website that officials in Charlottesville had rights under the Constitution to ignore the Virginia state law protecting Confederate war memorials. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
” Micah Schwartzman, Rich Schragger, and Nelson Tebbe also have a post on Slate making a similar criticism. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:05 pm
Churches have been hypocritical during the coronavirus outbreak, Cornell University’s Nelson Tebbe and University of Virginia’s Micah Schwartzman and Richard Schragger argue in The Washington Post. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson TebbeWe have been arguing (here, here, and here) that a religious exemption to the contraception mandate would raise serious concerns under the Establishment Clause. [read post]
My Comments on How to Save A Constitutional Democracy by Huq and Ginsburg (Also posted at Take Care)
31 Oct 2018, 8:26 am
(Among others, I worked with Joshua Matz, the publisher on this blog, as well as Micah Schwartzman and Nelson Tebbe.) [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson Tebbe began an important conversation with their post on this blog about the contraceptive mandate and the Establishment Clause. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 5:33 pm
” Three law professors writing for the legal blog Just Security – Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger and Micah Schwartzman – make the opposite argument. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:10 pm
To quote the symposium contribution of my friends and colleagues Nelson Tebbe, Micah Schwartzman, and Richard Schragger, it is a “demand of justice” that political authorities in diverse and sometimes disagreeing communities avoid, to the extent their obligations to promote and protect the common good allow it, burdening religious exercise or violating religious conscience. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:48 am
Sawicki, Loyola University Chicago School of Law - Informed Consent and Disclosure of Providers’ Religious Convictions Moderator: Holly Fernandez Lynch, Executive Director, Petrie-Flom Center 1:15 - 2:35pm: Panel 4, The Impact of Religious Objections on the Health and Health Care of Others Amy Sepinwall, University of Pennsylvania - Conscience and Complicity: Assessing Pleas for Religious Exemption inHobby Lobby's Wake Nelson Tebbe,… [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
In earlier posts, such as this one, I noted that in the context of commercial activities, the Supreme Court—and virtually every other court, for that matter—has consistently construed the Free Exercise Clause and religious accommodation statutes not to require religious exemptions from generally applicable regulations, from at least 1944 until this week. [read post]
