Search for: "NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2025, 11:13 am
Strict Scrutiny Applies to the Statute as a Whole The state wanted NetChoice to prove its case provision-by-provision. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 8:51 am
Case Citation: NetChoice LLC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:42 am
NetChoice has provided evidence that in the face of such uncertainties about the statute’s requirements, the statute may cause covered businesses to deny children access to their platforms or content. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 9:29 am
Case Citation: NetChoice LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:42 am
The court says that it can proceed with a facial challenge to the DPIA requirement despite Moody because the obligation affects all regulated entities: Whether it be NetChoice’s members or other covered businesses providing online services likely to be accessed by children, all of them are under the same statutory obligation to opine on and mitigate the risk that children may be exposed to harmful or potentially harmful content, contact, or conduct online…in every circumstance… [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 9:02 am
Can NetChoice Bring a Facial Challenge? [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 10:52 am
NetChoice sought a late TRO to block the law. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 5:37 pm
While that appeal was pending, the Supreme Court decided Moody v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 8:23 am
[Note: tomorrow we’ll get the Supreme Court decisions in NetChoice v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 3:07 pm
In this regard, the Court echoed the Fifth Circuit's decision in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
Then, in Liapes v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Lonestar Communications Corporation LLC v Kaye & Ors [2023] EWHC 421 (Comm). [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 2:32 pm
In Bride v. [read post]
