Search for: "Netflix, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2011, 11:46 am
On March 11, 2011, Virginia resident Peter Comstock filed a class action complaint against Netflix, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:58 am
USA Today reported the Texas Rangers served Netflix, Inc. with legal papers on Oct. 1 for streaming the coming-of-age movie. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:25 am
Netflix Inc., 2020 WL 8509658, No. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Netflix, Inc. (9th Cir.), prepared by my UCLA School of Law students Aaron Boudaie, Eimile Nolan, and Simon Ruhland and by me, on behalf of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), PEN American Center, Inc. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 4:10 am
Netflix, Inc. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:15 am
Netflix, Inc., holding that that claims of Adaptive Streaming Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Here is the opinion: Netflix, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 7:48 am
Biogen, Inc. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 2:05 am
It’s pretty clear they are doing so at the direction of the Front Man and their other bosses at Squid Game, Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 11:28 am
Netflix, Inc., 3:11-cv-30168-MAP (D. [read post]
24 May 2011, 4:34 pm
In an April 29, 2011 opinion, the District Court for the Northern District of California granted defendant Netflix's summary judgment motion against a putative class of plaintiffs comprising of individuals who subscribed to Blockbuster, Inc.'s online DVD rental services. [read post]
5 May 2008, 6:00 am
(Consumer Cause, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:55 am
Netflix, Inc., et al., Case No. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:00 pm
Netflix, Inc. (2008) __ Cal.App.4th __.Frank Chavez sued Netflix, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential decision affirming a California district court’s award of attorneys’ fees in part to Netflix, Inc. for Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC’s “improper” litigation conduct. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential decision affirming a California district court’s award of attorneys’ fees in part to Netflix, Inc. for Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC’s “improper” litigation conduct. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:00 am
Former Netflix, Inc. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 12:36 pm
The AP reports that a small California (of course) company thinks it has a brilliant idea, a way to out-Netflix Netflix: Zediva Inc. is going to make available for viewing... [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:38 am
Netflix, Inc. rejects that claim, giving four reasons why not, including: [P]laintiffs' strict liability claim fails because it is premised on the content and dissemination of the show. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Netflix, Inc., et al., affirmed the district court’s finding that patent claims asserted by Digital Media against Netflix, Amazon and Hulu were invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]