Search for: "Netflix, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2011, 11:46 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On March 11, 2011, Virginia resident Peter Comstock filed a class action complaint against Netflix, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:58 am by [email protected]
USA Today reported the Texas Rangers served Netflix, Inc. with legal papers on Oct. 1 for streaming the coming-of-age movie. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 2:05 am by Tim Reed, FordHarrison
It’s pretty clear they are doing so at the direction of the Front Man and their other bosses at Squid Game, Inc. [read post]
24 May 2011, 4:34 pm by Mona Solouki
In an April 29, 2011 opinion, the District Court for the Northern District of California granted defendant Netflix's summary judgment motion against a putative class of plaintiffs comprising of individuals who subscribed to Blockbuster, Inc.'s online DVD rental services. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:00 pm
Netflix, Inc. (2008) __ Cal.App.4th __.Frank Chavez sued Netflix, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential decision affirming a California district court’s award of attorneys’ fees in part to Netflix, Inc. for Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC’s “improper” litigation conduct. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential decision affirming a California district court’s award of attorneys’ fees in part to Netflix, Inc. for Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC’s “improper” litigation conduct. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 12:36 pm by Matthew David Brozik
The AP reports that a small California (of course) company thinks it has a brilliant idea, a way to out-Netflix Netflix: Zediva Inc. is going to make available for viewing... [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Gene Quinn
Netflix, Inc., et al., affirmed the district court’s finding that patent claims asserted by Digital Media against Netflix, Amazon and Hulu were invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]