Search for: "Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 1:24 pm by Tami Cowden
The Supreme Court had previously held that states were not immune from suit under the family-care provisions of the Act in Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:29 am by Heidi Henson
Previously, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs, the Supreme Court had ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provisions. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:10 am by Heidi Henson
In 2003, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provision in subparagraph (C). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In 2003, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs (84 EPD ¶41,391), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provision in subparagraph (C). [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:01 am
  The only cases where the Court has upheld Section 5 legislation against this standard have been where the legislation either benefitted a class that gets heightened equal protection scrutiny (Nevada Dept of Human Resources v. [read post]