Search for: "New Jersey v. Delaware" Results 341 - 360 of 741
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 10:46 am by Aaron Rubin
The court began its analysis by describing the holdings of the two leading cases on the issue: New Jersey’s Dendrite Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
  The defendant was Pfizer, which is incorporated in Delaware and has its principal place of business in New York. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Defendant’s parent began using its mark in the US as early as 1911, and defendant/those in privity with it used the mark continuously in Canada and the United States, including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Florida, Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, the Rockies, Texas, and Louisiana. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 7:38 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 53356 (D NJ, April 23, 2015), a New Jersey federal district court in dealing with a sprawling 537-page complaint raising 49 counts relating to plaintiff's arrest and his being charged with weapons and drug offenses among other things dismissed plaintiff's claim that his free exercise rights were infringed when officials used his given name rather than his Moorish name on court papers.In Barstad v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am by Michael Klarman
Within a few months, a state court ruling made New Jersey the fourteenth state to do so. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:50 am by Robin Shea
According to a January 2015 article on the Pew Charitable Trusts website, the following states currently require some form of pregnancy accommodation: Alaska, California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, Texas (government employees only), and West Virginia. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 6:18 am by Nassiri Law
On appeal, it was noted several other district courts in the Third Circuit (which covers Delaware, New Jersey and parts of Pennsylvania) had sided with employers in similar disputes. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 12:13 pm by David Munkittrick
A decision from the Third Circuit would only be binding in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware, but the case is being watched nation-wide as it promises to be the first appellate-level guidance on the FTC’s authority in the data security context. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:12 am by Devin J. Chwastyk
In a new decision, the first on the subject by a federal appellate court, the Third Circuit has ruled in McMaster v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:52 am by Meena Harris
  Assuming that the Third Circuit publishes its opinion in this case, the ruling would be binding in Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. [read post]
Last May, a similar lawsuit against Wyndham’s directors and officers, which had been filed under seal in February, was unsealed in the District of New Jersey. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, as discussed here, in an October 20, 2014 opinion, District of New Jersey Judge Stanley Chesler, applying Delaware law, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint in the Wyndham Worldwide case. [read post]