Search for: "New Jersey v. Delaware"
Results 101 - 120
of 750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2006, 6:09 am
Muhammad v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 10:22 am
Last month, we posted about New Jersey Magistrate Judge Bongiovanni's decision to disqualify a lawyer for a conflict of interest under Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7, in Wyeth and Cordis Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 3:00 am
Smith v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:23 am
Smithers v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
The Court announced yesterday that there had been a settlement in the New Jersey case involving Former Premier Michael Misick of the Turks and Caicos Islands. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 3:07 pm
In a 4-3 decision, the California Supreme Court has found specific jurisdiction over the product liability claims of nonresidents against Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS), a Delaware company headquartered in New York with substantial operations in New Jersey. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Plaintiffs were residents of New Jersey, and the complained-of surgery occurred in Delaware. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 12:08 pm
Recently, the Delaware Superior Court, in a case entitled HLTH Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 7:03 am
The Appellate Division (New Jersey's intermediate appellate court) reversed and remanded the case for a new trial, adopting a per se rule that requires expert testimony to prove a causal link between the extent of damage to an automobile in an accident and the cause or extent of injuries arising from that accident consistent with Delaware law in Davis v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 7:03 am
The Appellate Division (New Jersey's intermediate appellate court) reversed and remanded the case for a new trial, adopting a per se rule that requires expert testimony to prove a causal link between the extent of damage to an automobile in an accident and the cause or extent of injuries arising from that accident consistent with Delaware law in Davis v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:28 am
District Court for the District of New Jersey 1993) (quoting Van Dusen v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 12:44 pm
In a recent opinion, Chief Judge Simandle of the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 3:29 am
Bordes, 607 A2d 465 (Del Ch 1991), which as far as I can tell is still good law, the Delaware Chancery Court disregarded a New Jersey choice of law clause in a shareholders agreement and applied Delaware law under the internal affairs doctrine to resolve a dispute over a shareholder voting trust because, the court found, “Delaware . . . has a greater interest than does New Jersey in regulating stockholder voting rights in… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
In this post from last November, I mentioned two New Jersey decisions applying New Jersey law rather than the law of the state of incorporation. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:00 am
In New Jersey, an appellate panel in Denike v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
In a closely watched case for employers, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
New York, Pennsylvania, and Delaware residents often travel through and commute to New Jersey, purchasing goods along their travels. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:08 pm
For the most recent iteration of Delaware law on the topic of forum non conveniens, as it has evolved over the last few years, careful readers should be aware of the recent Chancery decision in Sweeny v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:30 am
Dewey v. [read post]
