Search for: "New Jersey v. Perez" Results 21 - 40 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2012, 11:20 am by Sean Wajert
A state appeals court recently upheld a judgment for defendant in the first bellwether trial in consolidated litigation in New Jersey over claims concerning the cancer drugs Aredia and Zometa. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 10:22 am by John J. Sullivan
”  In fact, the court’s use of the word “yet” seemed generous, as only one jurisdiction has adopted this exception, and since then no other state has followed:  [S]ince the direct-to-consumer exception was created in New Jersey in Perez v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 11:20 am by Schachtman
Arguably, the prestige of the New Jersey Supreme Court never recovered. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004)), with jurisdiction over Michigan – yet another court out of New York now presumes to know New Jersey law better than the New Jersey courts (McDarby v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:50 pm
  The Perez exception was “adopted only in New Jersey,” and was unnecessary, given the Third Restatement’s exception for situations where “health-care providers will not be in a position to reduce the risks of harm. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
LEXIS 16980 (D NJ, March 4, 2009), a New Jersey federal district court refused to permit an immigration detainee to challenge the absence of Halal food at the Bergen County jail unless in an amended complaint plaintiff is able to detail facts distinguishing this from an earlier 3rd Circuit case that denied a similar claim.In Prentiss v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm by Amy Howe
A CVSG in an education case The justices called for the views of the U.S. solicitor general in Perez v. [read post]