Search for: "New York Cent. R. Co. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am by David Kopel
This post lists all the sources cited by the majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO, United University Professions, Police Benevolent Association of the New York State Troopers, Inc., New York State Law Enforcement Officers Union, Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO et al., Court Attorneys Association of the City of New York et al., New York State Police Investigators Association, Local 4 IUPA, AFL-CIO et… [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO, United University Professions, Police Benevolent Association of the New York State Troopers, Inc., New York State Law Enforcement Officers Union, Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO et al., Court Attorneys Association of the City of New York et al., New York State Police Investigators Association, Local 4 IUPA, AFL-CIO et… [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
Hence the call to a New York-based attorney I had worked with in the early 1990s when I lived in Manhattan and worked for a commodity finance group. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1097 (8th Cir. 1973) (voiding as vague statute punishing "libelous, scurrilous, defamatory words" written on the outside of an envelope"). [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In the Supreme Court term that ended last month, the Court decided United States v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 431 U.S. 291 (1977) (same, despite Justice Stevens' argument in dissent, id. at 317, 321, that obscenity law should only be enforceable through civil remedies); New York v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 431 U.S. 291 (1977) (same, despite Justice Stevens’ argument in dissent, id. at 317, 321, that obscenity law should only be enforceable through civil remedies); New York v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:44 pm
Underwriting Assn., 63 NY2d 201, 209-210 [1984]; Alexander v New York Cent. [read post]