Search for: "New York Cent. R. Co. v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Approximately one month later, the EEOC issued a Dismissal and Notice of Rights, which explained that the agency's "‘review of the evidence . . . fail[ed] to indicate that a violation ha[d] occurred,'" and notified each employee of his or her right to sue.The employees then filed a lawsuit against the employer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York,… [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:33 am
Co. v New York Cent. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:37 am
v Bettenhauser, 95 NY2d 185, 188; see State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
STATEMENT OF MAYOR MICHAEL R. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
New York Cent. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Tompkins‟ case comports with the United States and Florida Constitutions. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
United States, 431 U.S. 291 (1977) (same, despite Justice Stevens' argument in dissent, id. at 317, 321, that obscenity law should only be enforceable through civil remedies); New York v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
And the only reason the government lost the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:05 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:17 pm
New York Telephone Co., 434 U.S. 159, 172 (1977); 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:05 pm
" They argued that "if CIL is not federal common law, ‘a tort . . . committed in violation of the law of nations' would not arise under ‘the Laws of the United States' within the meaning of Article III, rendering Filartiga-type suits constitutionally suspect. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with "actual malice"Shulman v Hunderfund, 2009 NY Slip Op 02263, Decided on March 26, 2009, Court of AppealsIn the words of Justice Smith, "In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co.… [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
In Morris v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:41 pm
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner at 20-24. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 3:09 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the complaint. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
Amy Kaufman, Head of William R. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:03 pm
Garden & Pet Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:36 am
In affirming the arbitration award the Appellate Division noted that "In circumstances when the parties agree to submit their dispute to an arbitrator, courts generally play a limited role," citing New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321 wherein the Court of Appeals said that "[A]n arbitrator's award should not be vacated for errors of law and fact committed… [read post]
