Search for: "New York Central Securities Corp. v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York earlier in their careers. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:36 pm
IntroductionOn June 18, 2007, the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-1 decision that investment banks are immune from antitrust scrutiny in connection with syndication and marketing techniques employed in underwriting initial public offerings, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Springfield, MA; Jesse Baker, President) 1ntact Information Security Solutions, Inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Decisions this Week United StatesPEN American Center v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm by Daniel Jin
Accordingly, Brazil has a very complex legal system, with a set of specific laws — issued by the Federal, State and Municipal Governments — and regulations — issued by administrative governmental authorities, such as the Central Bank of Brazil and the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (Comissão de Valores Mobiliários) — governing a variety of situations and environments, including rules applicable to the members of the… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
D&O Insurance Funds Entire $139 Million News Corp. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 22, 2009)Affirming that multiple plaintiff claims of discrimination etc were frivolous and that a plaintiff's attorney engaged in sanctionable conduct; remanded $660K+ atty fees order for more refined computation of amounts>> Noted here: Central Ohio Employment Law Update7th Circuit>> Jones v City of Springfield, No. 08-2085 (7th cir. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
– EPA News Release, July 14, 2010 Twenty-six parties have agreed to help clean up the Great Lakes Container Corp. [read post]