Search for: "New York City v. Pine" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2010, 12:56 pm
Last week, the New York Times featured this article on Chief Judge Lippman's impact on the New York Court of Appeals. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:34 pm by Matthew Lerner
Last week, the New York Times featured this article on Chief Judge Lippman's impact on the New York Court of Appeals. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 7:06 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his well-reasoned and comprehensive 48 page opinion in Evancho v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:27 am
 Plaintiffs are represented by Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP, a well-heeled New York plaintiff personal injury firm that had the resources to represent hundreds of plaintiffs in the World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation and battle Exxon in the New York City MTBE Litigation. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:27 am
 Plaintiffs are represented by Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP, a well-heeled New York plaintiff personal injury firm that had the resources to represent hundreds of plaintiffs in the World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation and battle Exxon in the New York City MTBE Litigation. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:14 am by Peter Mahler
If it lists any of the many counties comprising the Second Department (generally, the other three boroughs of New York City, Long Island, and the lower Hudson Valley) or the Third Department (generally, Albany and the eastern part of upstate New York), a dissolution petition will be barred. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:09 pm by William A. Ruskin
  Plaintiffs are represented by Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP, a well-heeled New York plaintiff personal injury firm that had the resources to represent hundreds of plaintiffs in the World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation and battle Exxon  in the New York City MTBE Litigation. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:56 am by David G. Badertscher
City of New York SUFFOLK COUNTYReal PropertyBank's Order of Reference Application Found 'Replete With Inaccurate Proofs'Bank of America NA v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Internet links to "21 CRR-NY" are set out below. 21 CRR-NY Notice Chapter I Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor Chapter II Board of Commissioners of Pilots Chapter III New York State Thruway Authority Chapter IV Syracuse Regional Airport Authority Chapter V New York State Bridge Authority Chapter VI New York Temporary State Commission on Lobbying Chapter VII… [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Internet links to "21 CRR-NY" are set out below. 21 CRR-NY Notice Chapter I Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor Chapter II Board of Commissioners of Pilots Chapter III New York State Thruway Authority Chapter IV Syracuse Regional Airport Authority Chapter V New York State Bridge Authority Chapter VI New York Temporary State Commission on Lobbying Chapter VII… [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Internet links to "21 CRR-NY" are set out below. 21 CRR-NY Notice Chapter I Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor Chapter II Board of Commissioners of Pilots Chapter III New York State Thruway Authority Chapter IV Syracuse Regional Airport Authority Chapter V New York State Bridge Authority Chapter VI New York Temporary State Commission on Lobbying Chapter VII… [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Internet links to "21 CRR-NY" are set out below. 21 CRR-NY Notice Chapter I Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor Chapter II Board of Commissioners of Pilots Chapter III New York State Thruway Authority Chapter IV Syracuse Regional Airport Authority Chapter V New York State Bridge Authority Chapter VI New York Temporary State Commission on Lobbying Chapter VII… [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 1:30 am
If you are already an online subscriber to the New York Law Journal you should be able to click on any of the links provided below, sign in, and access the full text of articles listed. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In Matter of Save the Pine Bush v Common Council of the City of Albany, the Court held that both the individual petitioners and the organization had standing to challenge an action that allegedly threatened certain endangered species within the Pine Bush area. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In Matter of Save the Pine Bush v Common Council of the City of Albany, the Court held that both the individual petitioners and the organization had standing to challenge an action that allegedly threatened certain endangered species within the Pine Bush area. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
Such relief is rarely granted under New York law, where, as in the case at bar, the movant would be receiving the ultimate relief pendente lite and could ultimately be compensated through monetary damages, Rosa Hair Stylists Inc. v Jaber Food Corp., 218 AD2d 793 (2d Dep’t 1995); see Matos v City of New York, 21 AD3d 936 (2d Dep’t 2005); Neos v Lacey, 291 AD2d 434 (2d Dep’t 2002). [read post]