Search for: "New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. New York" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2009, 3:06 am
New York Rapid Transit Corp., 66 F.2d 592, 595 (2d Cir. 1933).The distinction between a claimant's 'damages' and an infringer's 'profits' as terms of art is thoroughly discussed in Judge Herlands' opinion that held that GP's profits were not the proper measure of recovery and that USP's damages should be computed on the basis of a reasonable royalty. 243 F.Supp. 500 (S.D.N.Y.1965)(...)Thus, although we affirm… [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rapid Transit Corp., 66 F.2d 592, 593 (2d Cir. 1933).Yet it has long been recognized that a patent that combines“old elements” may “give[] the entire value to thecombination” if the combination itself constitutes a completelynew and marketable article. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]