Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 1 - 20 of 297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2020, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Zeh has made a prima facie showing that, as a part-time misdemeanor public defender, he is not a public official under the standard of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
We need not even engage the question of how much weight to give original meaning in a case of first impression to know that Thomas’s proposals to completely abandon the New Deal understanding of the Commerce power or the rule of New York Times v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:02 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
It cites cases including New York Times Co. v Sullivan, which states that “The right of citizens to inquire, to speak and to use information to reach consensus is a precondition to enlightened self-government and a necessary means to protect it. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Jeffrey Morris and Rodger Citron
He then worked at Cravath, Swaine & Moore, a prestigious law firm in New York City before becoming an assistant U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
— Phil Miles (@PhilipMiles) December 15, 2019 Day 89: #SCOTUS100 New York Times Co v Sullivan - Defamation of public figures requires actual malice… thus protecting NYT's long-standing tradition of negligently publishing false information. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
That there is a countervailing interest and, hence, an excuse in this case is clear from the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 11:13 am by DONALD SCARINCI
After the jury returned a verdict for petitioner, the District Court decided that the standard enunciated in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Geoffrey Stone and David Strauss in connection with their new book, “Democracy and Equality: The Enduring Constitutional Vision of the Warren Court” (Oxford University Press, 2020). [read post]