Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 1 - 20 of 433
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The $1 billion settlement – approved by the Southern District of New York on September 8, 2023 – is one of the Top 20 largest of all time. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:06 pm by Lee E. Berlik
When public figures bring defamation lawsuits, First Amendment concerns dictate that they must demonstrate “actual malice” as a prerequisite to recovery (See New York Times Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:30 am by jonathanturley
Hill, which held that a family suing Life Magazine for false light must shoulder the burden of the actual malice standard under New York Times v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:08 am by Eugene Volokh
" The Court usurped control over libel law and imposed its own elevated standard in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
NBCUniversal, LLC, the most recent of a series of petitions asking the court to overrule New York Times v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Rather, they typically mean to imply that there is no moral basis for distinguishing plant foods from animal foods, so one may as well eat animal foods.Sherry frames her consideration of this objection by respectfully considering a 2009 article in the New York Times with the not very respectful title Sorry, Vegans: Brussels Sprouts Like to Live, Too. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:31 pm by INFORRM
The webinar will include panel sessions “Precedent in the Balance: Imagining a world without Sullivan (New York Times v Sullivan, 1964)” and “Key emerging trends on the threats to free expression and democracy” – both to be followed by Q&A discussions. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Their failure to do so takes on pressing importance in the face of proliferating, politically motivated defamation lawsuits and of calls to overrule New York Times v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v Public Service Commission of New York 447 US 557, 566 (1980) Powell J (for the Court) held that, in such cases, a four-part analysis has developed: At the outset, we must determine whether the expression is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Second, the reasonable viewer, unlike when Sullivan, Butts or Gertz were decided, no longer takes the time to research and verify reporting that often is not, in fact, news. [read post]