Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 201 - 220 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2011, 10:52 am
However, the principal limitation the Hustler case applies is the protection from the New York Times v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:37 am by Brian Wolfman
A person familiar with our country’s core values—our devotion to democratic self-governance, as well as to “uninhibited, robust, and wide-open” debate, New York Times Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:39 am by mmoreland
Following New York Times Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, even prohibitions on seditious libel, rejected by this Court in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:54 am
Judges Split on Former Sullivan & Cromwell Partner's Income in Divorce Case New York Law Journal Whether a Sullivan & Cromwell partner-turned-investment-banker earns $330,000 a year, twice as much or 10 times as much has divided a New York court reviewing the maintenance and child-support arrangements of his divorce. [read post]
7 Dec 2012, 2:53 pm by Bexis
  A company based outside of Connecticut, New York, and/or Vermont (the states of the Second Circuit) could easily face suits brought in its home state over promotional activities that occurred in a Second Circuit state.And finally, Caronia is not a product liability action involving allegations of truthful (at least, according to our side) off-label promotion. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
And there is some talk that the firm is in merger discussions again, this time with a firm with New York ties. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm by Mark Bennett
I guess I missed it at the time because it’s on Forbes.com, which I try to avoid. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:07 am by Ken White
The court applied the familiar "gist" or "sting" doctrine, saying that misquotes are only "false" for defamation purposes if they materially change the meaning of the quote: We conclude that a deliberate alteration of the words uttered by a plaintiff does not equate with knowledge of falsity for purposes of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:46 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
For example, in Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Zimmer, Inc., 927 F.2d 124, 129 (2d Cir. 1991) (applying New York law); Phelps v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:00 am by New Books Script
The briar patch : the people of the state of New York… Kempton, Murray, 1917-, TRIALS WOLFE 10 The briar patch : the people of the state of New York v. [read post]