Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 221 - 240 of 435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2020, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
That there is a countervailing interest and, hence, an excuse in this case is clear from the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am by Peter Mahler
I’ve previously featured on this blog several illustrative fixed price buy-sell lawsuits precipitated by stale or absent certificates of value, including Sullivan v Troser Management, Nimkoff v Central Park Plaza Associates, and DeMatteo v DeMatteo Salvage Co. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Publisher and distributor liability is consistent with the First Amendment, despite the chilling effect it might sometimes create, so long as it complies with the New York Times v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
Although these types of public accusations may be `vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp,’ New York Times Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 6:20 am
Even though Albritton was not a public figure, he ruled, the “actual malice” standard adopted by the Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Jeffrey Morris and Rodger Citron
He then worked at Cravath, Swaine & Moore, a prestigious law firm in New York City before becoming an assistant U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 12:21 pm by Barry Barnett
Declined to deem Padrick and Obsidian "public figures", a status that would have required them, under The New York Times Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In The New York Times, Alan Blinder reports on the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision last term in Hurst v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Zeh has made a prima facie showing that, as a part-time misdemeanor public defender, he is not a public official under the standard of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:06 am by Christopher Bird
Further, the English approach places the burden of proving that no damage has been caused on the defendant.This differs from the American approach to defamation, which since New York Times Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:01 am by Lee E. Berlik
In the landmark case of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, the Supreme Court established the rule that a public official must prove “actual malice” to prevail in a defamation action based on a statement relating to his or her official conduct. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:07 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
But his speech is constitutionally protected, and fully consistent with our “profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials” New York Times Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
McDermott Will Recruits Sullivan & Cromwell Veteran New York Law Journal McDermott, Will & Emery has recruited to its New York office a former senior trusts and estates partner at Sullivan & Cromwell. [read post]