Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 241 - 260 of 400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
When one considers the libel cases from the mainstream First Amendment casebooks—New York Times Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
Good news in managed care: Families can better access services, because co-pays are minimal; through case coordination, some children are served for their needs, not just their diagnosis. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 07811-22 Centre for Media Monitoring v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 10441-22 Yates v Retford, Gainsborough & Worksop Times, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were no new cases issued on the Media and Communications list last week. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
The first amicus brief was filed by The New York Times Company, The Associated Press, Gannet Co. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:52 am
 However, the principal limitation the Hustler case applies is the protection from the New York Times v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
The title of a column by New York Times opinion writer David Brooks, published the day before the hearings began, dismissed the committee's vision offhandedly: “The Jan. 6 Committee Has Already Blown It. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am by Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D.
John Fullerton III posted “New York’s At-Will Employment Rule Applies to Compliance Officer Allegedly Fired for Objecting to Misconduct”, a piece written by William Milani and Anna Kolontyrsky about Sullivan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:37 am by Brian Wolfman
A person familiar with our country’s core values—our devotion to democratic self-governance, as well as to “uninhibited, robust, and wide-open” debate, New York Times Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, even prohibitions on seditious libel, rejected by this Court in New York Times Co. v. [read post]