Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 261 - 280 of 435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 5:30 am by jonathanturley
Hill, which held that a family suing Life Magazine for false light must shoulder the burden of the actual malice standard under New York Times v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
NBCUniversal, LLC, the most recent of a series of petitions asking the court to overrule New York Times v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:58 pm
"There were some very large losses during that period," says Jonathan Harris, a commercial litigation partner at New York's Harris, Cutler & Houghteling. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
When one considers the libel cases from the mainstream First Amendment casebooks—New York Times Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 07811-22 Centre for Media Monitoring v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 10441-22 Yates v Retford, Gainsborough & Worksop Times, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were no new cases issued on the Media and Communications list last week. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
Good news in managed care: Families can better access services, because co-pays are minimal; through case coordination, some children are served for their needs, not just their diagnosis. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
The first amicus brief was filed by The New York Times Company, The Associated Press, Gannet Co. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:52 am
 However, the principal limitation the Hustler case applies is the protection from the New York Times v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
The title of a column by New York Times opinion writer David Brooks, published the day before the hearings began, dismissed the committee's vision offhandedly: “The Jan. 6 Committee Has Already Blown It. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am by Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D.
John Fullerton III posted “New York’s At-Will Employment Rule Applies to Compliance Officer Allegedly Fired for Objecting to Misconduct”, a piece written by William Milani and Anna Kolontyrsky about Sullivan v. [read post]