Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan"
Results 361 - 380
of 435
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Tanco’s facility at 10520 Wolcott Drive, Kansas City, Kan., did not have an FRP in place at the time of a May 2009 EPA inspection, in violation of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA), according to an administrative consent agreement and final order filed in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:45 am
From Vorhees New Jersey Legal Malpractice Blog: In Sullivan v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:14 am
V. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
Moreover, these innovations in Commonwealth law form part of a process of development that we can trace back to the US Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times v Sullivan 376 U.S. 254 (1964). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
Sullivan, Hall, Booth & Smith, John E. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:42 am
New York Times Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am
His opinions for the Court in areas such as the First Amendment (New York Times v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:29 am
For more information about the Graham case, check out the New York Times coverage or this Wall Street Journal article.Professors Connie de la Vega and Michelle Leighton were co-authors of the SCOTUS amicus curiae brief submitted by Amnesty International in the Graham and Sullivan cases, arguing that the Court should consider international law and opinion when applying the Eighth Amendment to life sentences without parole for juveniles. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:03 pm
But the one thing that is clear, from the landmark New York Times Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Washington Beef is owned by AgriBeef Co., a privately-held company in Boise, Idaho. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
” Summary Biography [by Tom Goldstein] Elena Kagan was born on April 28, 1960 in New York. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:59 am
Accuses Goldman Sachs of Fraud in Mortgage Deals [New York Times] [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:46 am
”Further, said the court, the plaintiff must also show that the defamatory statement is actionable “irrespective of special harm” [defamation per se] or that publication of the statement caused special harm [defamation per quod].If, however, the plaintiff is a public official or a public figure, the Circuit Court said that the First Amendment requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant’s statements are false and that the defendant acted with actual malice, citing… [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254… [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
Gelstein, the New York Court of Appeals noted: Under the [New York] Times [Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254)] malice standard, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the “statements [were] made with [a] high degree of awareness of their probable falsity” (Garrison v Louisiana, 379 US 64, 74). [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:50 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), and New York Times Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
" New York Times Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:03 pm
Defendant relies heavily on New York Times Co. v. [read post]
