Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan"
Results 361 - 380
of 404
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
Please do not ask to be "removed" from this database unless you have the ability to travel back in time and undo your filing. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
Sullivan, 978 F.2d 560, 562-63 (9th Cir. 1992); Biotics Research Corp. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Please do not ask to be "removed" from this database unless you have the ability to travel back in time and undo your filing. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
The first amicus brief was filed by The New York Times Company, The Associated Press, Gannet Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:49 am
New York State Div. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 4:42 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:34 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run July 19, 2009. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:58 am
Arbitration
New York Law Journal
A suit accusing Robert J. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:00 am
Christian Sullivan, appellant
APPELLATE DIVISIONSECOND DEPARTMENTCriminal Practice
Ex-Girlfriend Rape Victim's Bruises, Scrapes 'Physical Injury' Under SORA Risk Guidelines
NEW YORK COUNTYContracts
Insureds' Breach of Contract Claims Against Insurer Dismissed as Untimely, Time-Barred
Industry City Management v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 12:34 pm
The New York office hired me to work in their London, England office assisting Americans living and working overseas with their tax structures, tax returns and tax compliance. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:25 am
New York Times Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with "actual malice"Shulman v Hunderfund, 2009 NY Slip Op 02263, Decided on March 26, 2009, Court of AppealsIn the words of Justice Smith, "In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:18 am
"Further, said the court, the plaintiff must also show that the defamatory statement is actionable "irrespective of special harm" [defamation per se] or that publication of the statement caused special harm [defamation per quod].If, however, the plaintiff is a public official or a public figure, the Circuit Court said that the First Amendment requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant's statements are false and that the defendant acted with actual malice, citing… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(IP Think Tank) A defining time for the IP market (IAM) Busting an intellectual capital myth (Pat Sullivan’s Blog) Governments, financial stakeholders meet on policy for IP as collateral (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP finance) How much should you spend on start-up marketing? [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:59 am
Co. of New York v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States Issue: Whether, if a defendant violates the terms of supervised release, a district court may base the new sentence upon factors stated in 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)(2)(A). [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Supreme Court's 1964 decision in The New York Times Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 9:24 pm
(For law geeks, see Alabama Power Co. v. [read post]
