Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 21 - 40 of 384
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
The California test, which borrows from copyright’s fair-use analysis the consideration of “whether the new work merely supersede[s] the objects of the original creation, or instead adds something new, with a further purpose or different character, altering the first with new expression, meaning, or message; it asks, in other words, whether and to what extent the new work is transformative. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
You can also read the current draft (27 pages); here is the Introduction: The actual malice rule of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., 116 AD3d 740, 741, quoting Loevner v Sullivan & Strauss Agency, Inc., 35 AD3d 392, 393). [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am by INFORRM
However, whether the New York Times v Sullivan precedent and its relevant extensions are fit for purpose in the 21st century is a question which is unlikely to go away. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The mayor and a trustee of a New York town sent a letter to a newspaper demanding to learn more about who was involved in an article critical of local officials. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Publisher and distributor liability is consistent with the First Amendment, despite the chilling effect it might sometimes create, so long as it complies with the New York Times v. [read post]
A judge for the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that Lawson was protected by the principles espoused in New York Times Co v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
Circuit stayed a decision by Judge Emmet Sullivan of the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
It is not a new form of liability or speech compulsion, such as the right of reply struck down in Miami Herald Co. v. [read post]