Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 21 - 40 of 394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  The ambitious landscaping required the transplant of several 100-year-old mature trees, which became the topic of a fawning article in the New York Times. [read post]
”[10] Thus, the SEC mandated extensive disclosure of environmental proceedings, making clear that the Commission would recalibrate this disclosure standard over time. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:40 am by Eugene Volokh
Most observers, including some prominent law professors and other members of the legal commentariat sharing their perspectives in outlets such as the New York Times, Washington Post, Reuters, Wired, USA Today, and Politifact, have opined that it likely does not. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
See Note 44, ante (warning against broad liability schemes that would encourage landlords to act as law enforcement).[15] The New York intermediate appellate court took a similar view in Gill v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 2:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
Co-defendants filed similar petitions in Percoco v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:32 am by Samarth Desai
And as Justice William Brennan wrote in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Free Speech L. 509 (2022); here's the Introduction: The actual malice rule of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
The California test, which borrows from copyright’s fair-use analysis the consideration of “whether the new work merely supersede[s] the objects of the original creation, or instead adds something new, with a further purpose or different character, altering the first with new expression, meaning, or message; it asks, in other words, whether and to what extent the new work is transformative. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
You can also read the current draft (27 pages); here is the Introduction: The actual malice rule of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., 116 AD3d 740, 741, quoting Loevner v Sullivan & Strauss Agency, Inc., 35 AD3d 392, 393). [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am by INFORRM
However, whether the New York Times v Sullivan precedent and its relevant extensions are fit for purpose in the 21st century is a question which is unlikely to go away. [read post]