Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 61 - 80 of 435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am by Ryan Goodman
New York Times Co. v Sullivan and later libel cases do offer a defense for false speech about public people or entities—which Dominion may be held to be—if it was uttered without what the Court has characterized as “serious doubt” of its truth or a “high degree of awareness” of its probable falsity. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
After months of deliberation, last week the Supreme Court declined the most recent chance to revisit New York Times v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[Justice Thomas reiterates his desire to revisit the contours of defamation law and New York Times v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  The ambitious landscaping required the transplant of several 100-year-old mature trees, which became the topic of a fawning article in the New York Times. [read post]
”[10] Thus, the SEC mandated extensive disclosure of environmental proceedings, making clear that the Commission would recalibrate this disclosure standard over time. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:40 am by Eugene Volokh
Most observers, including some prominent law professors and other members of the legal commentariat sharing their perspectives in outlets such as the New York Times, Washington Post, Reuters, Wired, USA Today, and Politifact, have opined that it likely does not. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
See Note 44, ante (warning against broad liability schemes that would encourage landlords to act as law enforcement).[15] The New York intermediate appellate court took a similar view in Gill v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 2:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
Co-defendants filed similar petitions in Percoco v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:32 am by Samarth Desai
And as Justice William Brennan wrote in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Free Speech L. 509 (2022); here's the Introduction: The actual malice rule of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
The California test, which borrows from copyright’s fair-use analysis the consideration of “whether the new work merely supersede[s] the objects of the original creation, or instead adds something new, with a further purpose or different character, altering the first with new expression, meaning, or message; it asks, in other words, whether and to what extent the new work is transformative. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
You can also read the current draft (27 pages); here is the Introduction: The actual malice rule of New York Times Co. v. [read post]