Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 61 - 80 of 307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
When one considers the libel cases from the mainstream First Amendment casebooks—New York Times Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Concurring last month in the denial of a petition for review by a woman who had sued Bill Cosby for defamation, Justice Thomas called for the re-examination of New York Times v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 7:17 am by Jon Roland
 Justice Clarence Thomas has called for "revisiting" New York Times v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:07 am by Stephanie Sundier
US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Tuesday called for the court to review its ruling in New York Times v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am by Peter Mahler
I’ve previously featured on this blog several illustrative fixed price buy-sell lawsuits precipitated by stale or absent certificates of value, including Sullivan v Troser Management, Nimkoff v Central Park Plaza Associates, and DeMatteo v DeMatteo Salvage Co. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Kutler’s entry on New York Times Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
("Chubb") and Lockton Affinity, LLC maintains violated New York insurance law. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm pleased to say, though, that American law has turned sharply against attempts to punish speech that insults or even defames foreign political leaders; the old libel rules wouldn't survive New York Times Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
Applying the standards announced in New York Times v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:00 pm by Michael Farinacci, Stephen P. Younger
’”[xi] Here, Justice Ostrager determined that New York law is controlling because the Agreement was executed in New York and “is governed by New York law by way of a New York choice-of-law provision. [read post]