Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 81 - 100 of 364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2022, 4:32 am by Samarth Desai
And as Justice William Brennan wrote in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Free Speech L. 509 (2022); here's the Introduction: The actual malice rule of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
The California test, which borrows from copyright’s fair-use analysis the consideration of “whether the new work merely supersede[s] the objects of the original creation, or instead adds something new, with a further purpose or different character, altering the first with new expression, meaning, or message; it asks, in other words, whether and to what extent the new work is transformative. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
You can also read the current draft (27 pages); here is the Introduction: The actual malice rule of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., 116 AD3d 740, 741, quoting Loevner v Sullivan & Strauss Agency, Inc., 35 AD3d 392, 393). [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am by INFORRM
However, whether the New York Times v Sullivan precedent and its relevant extensions are fit for purpose in the 21st century is a question which is unlikely to go away. [read post]
A judge for the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that Lawson was protected by the principles espoused in New York Times Co v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
Circuit stayed a decision by Judge Emmet Sullivan of the U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 4:29 am by SHG
Distinguished science reporter Donald McNeil was recently ousted from The New York Times for vocalizing the n-word when answering a high school student’s question about whether a classmate deserved to be suspended for saying it. [read post]