Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 101 - 120 of 297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 7:11 am
”) (citing New York Times); City of Chicago v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:19 am
Speaking with current and former city officials, the New York Times takes a close look at New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn's "habit of hair-trigger eruptions of unchecked, face-to-face wrath." [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
App. 3d. 755, 758 (pdf) (biopsy allowed); Sullivan, Long & Haggerty, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:00 pm by Michael Farinacci, Stephen P. Younger
’”[xi] Here, Justice Ostrager determined that New York law is controlling because the Agreement was executed in New York and “is governed by New York law by way of a New York choice-of-law provision. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:14 am by The Law Librarian
Supreme Court decided New York Times Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
Alvarez makes clear that lies are not outside the protection of the First Amendment simply because they are lies, and while New York Times v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm pleased to say, though, that American law has turned sharply against attempts to punish speech that insults or even defames foreign political leaders; the old libel rules wouldn't survive New York Times Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
MacLennan (1908), the case that first recognized something like an "actual malice" test for speech about public officials, and that was later cited prominently for this proposition by New York Times Co. v. [read post]