Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 141 - 160 of 400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 7:11 am
”) (citing New York Times); City of Chicago v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
App. 3d. 755, 758 (pdf) (biopsy allowed); Sullivan, Long & Haggerty, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:00 pm by Michael Farinacci, Stephen P. Younger
’”[xi] Here, Justice Ostrager determined that New York law is controlling because the Agreement was executed in New York and “is governed by New York law by way of a New York choice-of-law provision. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by justinsilverman
The event will focus on “The Court, the Closet and the Press.” Wrote the event’s coordinators: Just as New York Times v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:50 pm by charley foster
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), and New York Times Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm pleased to say, though, that American law has turned sharply against attempts to punish speech that insults or even defames foreign political leaders; the old libel rules wouldn't survive New York Times Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
MacLennan (1908), the case that first recognized something like an "actual malice" test for speech about public officials, and that was later cited prominently for this proposition by New York Times Co. v. [read post]